The Atlantic magzine has an article this month about a new interpretation of Job.
[theatlantic.com]
Edward L. Greenstein is professor emeritus of Bible studies at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University and he has interpreted certain passages of Job resulting in a very untraditional take on this biblical story. Rather than being repentent when God reprands Job for cursing his birth and questioning his condition, Greenstein interprets the passages as Job being essentially defiant to the end. "This newly revealed Job, writes Greenstein, “is expressing defiance, not capitulation … If God is all about power and not morality and justice, Job will not condone it through acceptance.”"
Early on while reading through this article, I wondered if Job's questioning God allowing Job to lose everything would indicate that God lost the bet with the devil. Greenfield's reinterpretation of passages from Job would lend evidence that God did lose the bet.
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
4 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.As If I want to spend my time reading the part of the babble that started me on the road to atheism, at about age 8.....
AnneWimsey
Level 9
Aug 24, 2019
0
I wasn't too impressed with the screenplay for the remake of The day the Earth stood still either. Michael Rennie did klatu much better.
oldFloyd
Level 8
Aug 24, 2019
0
Klaatu was the "destroyer/robot, I think.....
@AnneWimsey - I believe Klaatu was played by Keanu Reeves in the most recent version. He was the alien advocate who could control the robot.
@RussRAB guess i need to rewatch it......I want the original, though!
@AnneWimsey - The original was a good show too. Watch whichever one you like best.
@AnneWimsey in the 1952 version Klaatu, Mr Carpenter was played by Michael Rennie Carpenter whose clothes he happens to steal at the naval base after being shot shortly after his arrival, Gort was the name of the robot. And it was Patricia Neal who says, Gort Klaatu barada nikto.
But it is only a story. Evangelicals take it as real and they get angry when you say god and the devil had a bet. What I always wanted to know was did Job get his original wife and children back at the end or are they different persons? If the originals, were they resurrected, and if so did they have to die again later? If they are truly resurrected why is Jesus called "the first fruits of the dead?" A look at the OT seems to show 9 people or so that were resurrected and the Evangelicals avoid these questions. If you admit that Job is only a story all of this can be avoided.
DenoPenno
Level 9
Aug 24, 2019
1
I never intended to suggest that Job was anything more than a story. Its translation and interpretation would matter to those who take it as more even if its just considered a parable-like story.
Nope, he got all new family members, the first ones were killed off...but apparently the new ones were an upgrade, nowhere does it mention he missed them once the new ones showed up.
@AnneWimsey The upgrade must have made it hard to miss them when they are no more than cattle.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.