Agnostic.com

31 4

i did not know where to post this either here or in religion
i find this a very interesting theory-again its just a theory
i welcome people much smarter than me to comment on this theory with some scientific insight

bklynite53 7 Dec 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

31 comments (26 - 31)

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Creation, big bang, science of the bible. I am ahead of many of you on these things. God revealed himself to me not so long ago and took me back in time. I learned a lot and actually got to meet the first disease germ, but I forgot his name.

Our creator is awaiting the start of eighth grade. He put us, his seven grade science fair (honorable mention), in the back of his closet. It is only a matter of time before the matrix breaks down.

0

Yet another attempt by religion to reconcile the inaccuracy of the bible with demonstrated reality. Now this guy with a PhD wants to explain how the six days of creation in the bible really covers 15 billion years of cosmic expansion. They even came up with a nifty little equation to support their theory.

If the days of creation have to be measured in this way then wouldn't time throughout the bible have to be measured in the same way? The faithful accept that the birth of Jesus was 2000 standard years ago. Why aren't these years measured in the same way as creation days? Why would there be two different measurements of time within the same book? Could it be that the redefined time they use to explain creation can;t be used to support the birth of Jesus because that would make his birth and Earth itself billions and billions, and billions of years older than it actually is? Biblical literalists say the Universe is 6000 years old. Is this measured in standard years or in creation days which would make the Universe about a trillion years old. Their revised timeframe is useful to explain just one of their biblical claims but none of the others.

Suspicious?

The thing is, if the bible is so accurate, why does there have to be so much mental gymnastics to try and bring it into some measure of alignment with proven reality?

One other thing, the age of the universe has only been measured as 13.7 billion years. I don't know where he's getting 15 billion.

0

To give an example of how the phrase “just a theory” suggests a misunderstanding of the word “theory”: The Theory of Evolution is still a theory after 150 years because it has continued to stand up to scrutiny and predictions made about how it works consistently are realized.

0

Maybe say it the other way around, science makes theoretical myths.

Word Level 8 Dec 5, 2019
0

To expound further from my post I just made, science can be looked at as being those that make up current mythology theories.

Word Level 8 Dec 5, 2019
0

Big bang theory IS a myth as stated by astronomer Carl Sagan at time 2 minutes and 49 seconds on video.

Word Level 8 Dec 5, 2019

He don't say myth in the sense of false, he says that it is a myth comparing as the knowledge of the beginning of all. Sagan is very poetic in his texts and he tries to shape science in a way that our monkey brain finds it beautiful and appealing to feelings.

When he talks about creation myth he is saying that Big-bang is the tale that science tells is the origin of the universe, comparing it with other "knowledge systems" like religion. But in all his texts is clear that what comes from science is more useful, trustworthy and true than other sources.

So if you stop isolating phrases and see the whole context, he is not saying it is false.

@Pedrohbds I never implied false, however I find people imply false when calling biblical allegory a myth.

I understand, modern science has a bigger lexicon to choose technical jargon to be more specific than what people may unapprecitatively refer to as "goat hearder myth".

@Pedrohbds myth

  1. a traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.

  2. a widely held but false belief or idea.

One thing is, "the big bang theory" is not a story.

So, Sagan was saying big bang is a story, or falsafiable?

@Pedrohbds allegory
a story, poem, or picture that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one.

So, now let's compare biblical story and big bang theory as myth and/or allegory?

@Pedrohbds what do you know about big bang theory?

Allegory of hidden meaning?

Ruach elohim was hovering over the waters.
Translated into English as spirit of god was hovering...

Original language "ruach" means force.

Force of almighty was hovering over waters.
Almighty one said, "let there be light" Then there was light. Genesis

To speak is to take air bouncing in lungs with out an intellegentable patter, force that air thru the mouth and give sounds of intellectual patterns.

Light is energy in an intellageable pattern of colors.
Genesis

Force is studied in physics and chemistry.
Infinate energy of undefinable 1/0 singularity, then bang, some 1000s of years later of expance, light forms.

Biblical allegory sounds like a story that the big bang theory could be formulated from.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:434935
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.