Well I'll be sure not to disappoint.

Ouch!

@RoboGraham I'd use each for its intended purpose instead of using convoluted memes to prove I only use 1 of my senses to make a descision.

@1of5

So you'd drink the mountain dew with all that sugar, caffeine, and artificial flavors?

I guess this one was a bit too abstract for you. I thought that by putting the word drink in there and with the two liquids having been poured in glasses with ice all ready to serve, you would understand that these are meant to be beverages. I suppose that is a bit convoluted to those of us less gifted in the intelligence department.

I suppose it would seem that way to someone only able to interpret politics in binary terms.

@RoboGraham That’s how it works in my nation… Ask anyone on the stage ..of three months go. You had a chance to promote, instead, you attacked. Apparently, that’s your way. You lost … but all but one of the ..two dozen having run for the Democratic Presidential Nominee had to…

Most ran as an opportunity to give air-time to a pet concern. They did. Didn’t see any Republicans debating with trump, did you … where was your outrage? Saved that for the Democratic Party, a softer target..?

So now, are you going to show the same level of understanding and dignity as those now having indorsed Biden for President … or continue your personal smear campaign?

I realize you’re not alone around here - at least ‘one of you’ is now hiding from me But that - and this above, does not show intelligence, understanding, or a willingness to work as the team it will take to turn this ship around. Are you with us - or against us?

@Varn

Your first paragraph is a bunch of fragmented sentences. Organize your thoughts more rationally if you expect people to understand your scattered reasoning.

I've got plenty of outrage for the republicans. The best thing I can do to counter them is to criticize my party when it does stupid things like nominating the candidate who is most likely to fail when going up against them. Arguing with republicans is similar to arguing with you, it's a lost cause. Arguing with other less dogmatic democrats can be fruitful.

No one has done any indorseing, whatever that is. I'll continue to call out corruption and poor leadership wherever I see it. And right now, there is a ton of it in the democratic establishment.

I think you may be confusing avoidance of speaking to you, because it is aggravating and useless, with "hiding".

" Are you with us - or against us?" That is exactly the binary attitude I'm referring to. If being with you means supporting a right wing sex offender who is opposed to my ideology in almost every way, I'm certainly not with you. If being against you means support the right wing sex offender president who is completely opposed to my ideology, well then I'm not against you either. If it's got to be Biden or Trump, I hope Biden gets it but I won't be helping him and I'm definitely not going to stop criticizing him just because he is the lesser evil.

@RoboGraham ...obviously - you’ve no one to talk to ..sorry, kinda.. But I am laughing. Again, I’ve read enough of your shit -- but keep posting - without blocking me - and you’ll read more of mine

@Varn

I never block anyone. You keep saying you've read enough but then you read more and chime in with a nonsense remark. You never actually try to counter my assertions with a logical argument because you are not capable. Clearly you are curious of what I have to say or you actually would stop reading.

It always ends the same way. You are outwitted so you say something condescending and throw up some winky smiley faces and claim to be laughing. It doesn't change the fact that your reasoning is not logical and your attempt to act like you can just brush it all off as a funny joke is not believable.