Agnostic.com

4 2

I think they can filibuster to stop trump's Supreme Court appointment.

[en.m.wikipedia.org]Filibuster%20is%20a%20tactic%20used,vote%20by%20means%20of%20obstruction.&text=Changes%20in%202013%20and%202017,legislation%20still%20requires%2060%20votes.

Lorajay 9 Sep 18
Share
Comments for this post have been closed - typically to allow the author to respond to them.

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

The filibuster died for judicial appointments under the hand of Harry Reed when he was senate majority leader. Our only hope is for some Republican senators to refuse to vote until after the election.

1

It would be nice. The Repubs have been hypocritically using the fillibuster way more than the Dems in recent decades, while the Dems are usually too chickenshit to use it, which shows they are really not that much of an opposition party to the Repubs.

Sadly true. We have a tendency to eat our own (Al Franken for one) while the Republicans circle the wagons and protect even the worst of their ilk as long as they follow party leadership.

2

That and it takes several months for confirmation process just stop Mitch from railroading process

bobwjr Level 10 Sep 19, 2020

the problem here is that McConnell can force an early vote before the vetting process is completed. The president has already had a running list of candidates and I can only assume that they have all been vetted to a point. The entire process can take weeks or months.

2

Do you think enough democrats can filibuster for a full 24 hours?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:535561
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.