. . . hmmm, there is NO "ride sharing" using Uber/Lyft

@Umbrella_Guard 2035. That 15 years..

@Umbrella_Guard, @FearlessFly When I used the term ride share, I was referring to Uber/Lyft. My point is they will get way more expensive. It will make ridership go down, it will cause people who have a car to drive more as well. I won't be able to afford to take Ubers as much. This hourly is based on ride time, the drivers only make money when they are on rides. This law is bullshit.

@barjoe And my point is that NO driver from those two SHARE RIDES -- there is no "ride sharing" with Uber/Lyft. Using that terminology is fake news.

@FearlessFly I explained that. I'll repeat what I said removing "ride shares" which you jumped on to call 'fake news'. I think this is a bad law.
"People of means will get used to paying more for Uber/Lyft rides. Poor people who currently take Uber/Lyft will not be able to afford to do so. The price of rides will go way up, ridership will go way down. This doesn't help drivers either."