Agnostic.com

6 9

Who are these "Tuttle Twins" our John Bircher keeps referencing?

The Tuttle Twins and the Case of the Really Bad Libertarian Propaganda
The Right gets ’em while they’re young.
Rob Larson
filed 29 September 2020 in ECONOMICS
Originally published in our magazine’s hallowed print edition2020JULY/AUGDETAILS

Anyone with kids in their family knows that one of the great things about them is their bottomless gullibility. Until critical thinking abilities (sometimes) develop in later life, children will believe any hilariously phony lie you tell them, for example that a minor deity is so excited to get their disgusting baby teeth that they leave printed American currency for it, with the Treasury Secretary’s name on it. It’s the dumbest thing in the world, but I and probably you believed it for years.

Sadly, some would abuse this adorable nature of kids for sleazy purposes. There’s a whole genre of apocryphal quotations by leaders of authoritarian movements, saying some version of “Give me the child for seven years and I’ll give you the man,” meaning those formative early years can shape beliefs that endure through adulthood. Jesuit leaders, Lenin and others are alleged to have said similar lines, but regardless of the exact provenance, the point is clear enough.

But Church and State are far from the only authoritarians seeing value in indoctrinating guileless kids. I learned this recently when the unscrupulous editor of a popular leftist magazine, let’s call it Present Developments, mailed me a large box of libertarian children’s lit known as the Tuttle Twins series, a series of illustrated stories and workbooks designed to teach youngsters the wonders of the free market. Having now perused all 11 books in the special “Tuttle Twins combo pack,” I can confirm that it’s exactly as bad as you think it is.

From the Mouths of Babes
Each Tuttle Twins book is based on the lessons of a prominent intellectual from the libertarian right, like Friedrich von Hayek, Ayn Rand, or Ludwig von Mises, with a dedication to the figure and a small bio on their work at the end. The author is Connor Boyack, Utah resident, Brigham Young U grad, and president/founder of Libertas Institute, a free market think tank, which is great considering we only have about nine hundred of those. He claims, “In that capacity he has changed a significant number of laws in favor of personal freedom and free markets,” presumably when not writing abominable Ayn Rand propaganda for defenseless kids.

There are many more books in the series, I would estimate about nine hundred thousand more, but I will conclude this review by saying the Tuttle Twins series is among the most wretchedly contrived, grotesquely unethically indoctrinating, cliché-ridden heaps of steaming garbage I’ve ever had the misfortune to read. Written to bring young people into one of the most disgraceful political tendencies in the world before they have the critical thinking skills to recognize it, it is a hideous fraud and an ugly twisted farce.

[currentaffairs.org]

t1nick 8 Dec 30
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Unfortunately, there seems to be no end to paraphernalia designed to indoctrinate, regardless which side you are on. Ultimately it is the parents decision what their children are exposed to, whether we like it or not. Best we can do is keep it out of public schools and anything govt related. Of course we can try to attack it in the media, but that is not a two-way street, it’s a damn rotary.

I hear what you are saying. But I reject arguments that implies that since one side is bad or guilty of some offense, and that the other side must also be equally guilty. Thats sort of a cop out and not true. One side can be particularly officious and guilty, but doesn't mean other factions are as well.

@t1nickyou are absolutely right. certainly the degree and culpability vary tremendously. Most religious or political factions have some activity here. I’m talking actual organizations. Let’s face it, they do it because it can be effective. The article you posted highlights a particularly egregious version, but the playbooks don’t vary that much.
If the organization doesn’t have some kind of promotional activity, what’s the point (and future) of that org?

@Canndue

However, the left is not equally AS guilty of propaganda gyrations and use as is the right. The left has their issues and problems, but this one is owned by the right.

2

Excellent article! The author offers some delicious ripostes to some disgusting children's fare.

1

I have heard of none of this. Something may or may not be real but that does not bring me in as a part of it.

3

Never heard of any of this.
Libertarians are silly.

@Hages

Perhaps, but they are generally all based on specious and false premises.

Actually you are being generous with your comment.

@Hages
Chomsky is some sort of libertarian socialist so point taken.

@Hages
Just as ancaps such as Rothbard had no trademark on anarchism, libertarians could come from quite different broader POVs.

The ACLU represents a form of libertarianism quite distinct from Rand or the Libertarian Party right? Though the LP may dovetail with many of the social rights stances of the ACLU and membership may overlap somewhat on a Venn diagram. I know people who are both.

I recall watching the 2016 LP convention on CSPAN and tough crowd hissing at Gary Johnson saying that driver licenses might be a good idea, so there’s divergence of views there too which may capture what you actually meant.

Happy New Year!

3

A stupid FB page followed by a stupid person. The current glitch in the site won't let us post pics and memes in the comments. The thirsty jerkoff will still be able to put up his bullshit in posts. I enjoy insulting him, I won't talk to anybody else like that. Fuck That Guy!

Oh well, if I could have posted my answer to his moronic question would be "don't know and really, really don't care!"

@Mofo1953

It seems you've been sitting around sucking on lemons again Carlos. Nobody really cares if you care or not.

@t1nick don't be too hard on yourself and call yourself nobody, because apparently you cared enough to reply to my comment. And by the way, yes, I love lemons, nothing wrong with sucking lemons, they are full of vitamin C, although I really prefer limes. Now take a chill pill and think about the stupidity in getting offended and bitch about what some other asshole wrote in an inane libertarian rag..

5

Thanks tor picking up on this. That member blocked me when I referred him to the 16th Amendment of the Constitution when he raised the libertarian battle cry "taxation is theft".

What The Tuttle Twins is doing is exactly the same as childhood religious indoctrination, and it's no coincidence that member refers to children's books for his posts. That is his comprehension level.

Exactly. They might as well be Mormans or Evangelicals, Islamists, or a Haredi jew.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:564841
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.