Agnostic.com

17 5

It seems that most outspoken anti-choice ("pro-life" ) people are in a religious community. Are agnostics or atheists more likely to be pro-choice? How much does belonging to a religion have to do with your views on abortion rights?

  • 70 votes
  • 0 votes
  • 3 votes
  • 1 vote
  • 5 votes
TerriCity 7 Apr 15
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

17 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I'm pro-choice, and I've encountered one atheist who was fiercely anti-abortion, forced-birth, all the way. I helped him moderate a debate group on Facebook until he went a little nuts and declared that because I'm pro-choice, I couldn't be a good moderator (yeah, not the most logical critter).

I've yet to meet a single person who is TRULY pro-life, meaning they actively foster or adopt children born into bad circumstances and they support humane health care, education, and other policies that affect people from cradle to grave. They'd have to be anti-war, anti-death penalty, pro public education, pro single payer healthcare, all sorts of things.

0

I was pro choice when I was still a religious nimrod.

0

The frames of reference from both sides of this issue are too narrow and too fanatic for any reconciliation. The names 'Pro-Life' and 'Pro-Choice' are disingenuous and designed for morons. They are meant to keep people steeped in ignorance and tools of the politically ambitious dividers of our society.

0

Other yes the woman should have the right but should it not be ajoint decision between man and woman for party involved

1

I think atheists aren't influenced by what apologists claim the bible says, and more by science. It can still be a touchy subject.

I think atheists and agnostics are more supportive of women's rights too.

JimG Level 8 Apr 15, 2018
1

It's not just the nine months but a whole life so not to be taken lightly ever.

1

I have discovered from this site there are non-religious people who are against abortion. I was even a bit shocked to find a close friend was also against abortion and she is a lifelong atheist. The fact that my late partner unapologetically admitted to having an abortion and the two women were very close friends surprised me even more. Her reasoning was she actually believes human life begins at conception. With many this is purely an emotional issue.

0

More nonsense based on the notion of God sitting on a cloud, watching people have sex, happily tapping away at the 'bless them with a baby' button as and when it suits his mood. How dare you go against his will! Even if it is a father who's raped his 14 year old daughter, if God tapped that button, then the fruit of that underage, incestuous rape is his will.

Yes folks, God condones rape of children by their parents. There's 'working in mysterious ways' and then there's demonstrable bullshit.

0

I was pro choice even when I thought I was religious. I will always be pro choice even though I'll likely never encounter said choice myself.

0

Abortions in the third trimester make me very uncomfortable. Otherwise I support choice.

Those are called 'births.'

Not an attack on OP, just stating some reality.
As of 2012, third trimester abortions made up only 0.0002% of abortions. A portion of women who endure this procedure are facing death or catastrophic health consequences of they remain pregnant.
Even when this is the case, the procedure is to induce labor, forcing a premature birth. The infant is then treated like any other premie and it is not unusual for that child to survive. Since 3rd trimester abortions are typically of "wanted" pregnancies, that child is likely to go on to a full, happy life. In fact, chances are the "abortion" will be referred to as a premature birth by the family.

The other scenario is the fetus has a condition which will result in death before or shortly after birth, often with accompanying pain or other is a catastrophic defect which precludes any chance of a even somewhat normal life. Many conditions, like anecephaly (fatal) cannot be reliably detected in early pregnancy, otherwise the abortion would happen earlier. In those cases, typically the fetus is euthanized, in utero, if it is not already dead, then it is "birthed" by the woman and if not possible, by cesarean. It is NOT chopped to bits, live, inside the uterus to allow removal. That is just one of the many lies spread by the anti-choice crowd.

If you consider for a bit what is involved in a late term abortion you would realize that women DO NOT undertake this procedure lightly nor do they do it as a form of birth control. Women DO NOT carry a baby for over 6 months then decide, "You know, I just don't feel like being a mom after a!l, I'll have that abortion now."
To believe otherwise is to harbor some seriously hateful, misogynistic attitudes about who and what women are. If anything you should have sympathy for women who have late term abortions, it is devastating for most of them.

@DotLewis i am not arguing for or against anything at this time, but i would like to point out that in fact some women do choose to have a late term abortion due to a change of heart. it may not be common, but i had a friend a few years back that was pregnant into the third trimester. she was all thrilled about a baby, until she started thinking as time drew near, what she would be giving up. she said in the end, her choice was due to the fact that she still had an urge to be wild. she said she didnt want to miss the parties and trips and adventures she enjoyed because she was tied down to some kid.not saying its common, but it does happen.

1

It seems the more convinced a person is that they're right about their religious beliefs, the more they feel justified to interfere in other people's ethics and morality decisions. As if they're conviction confers an authority to tell others what to believe and how to behave. That is particularly true with regards to sexuality and a woman's body. For some reason, less true about a man's body.

1

Non believers tend to look at the evidence and other statistic factors . The religious go by their emotions or what they are told

2

A Woman has the right to choose. WhenI was 42 I had the choice to make. My first daughter was born 3 months prematurely, I was in the hospital a week trying to stop it. I was told by the doctors that I would have problems having a normal birth. My daughter Becky had cerebral palsy and special needs plus I had a higher chance of having a Down-Syndrome baby. Family urged me to abort and friends supported my decision to have the baby. The baby's father and I got married. I had a normal pregnancy and a normal baby. It was my decision no one elses.

2

There is a greater risk of life to a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term than to have an abortion. Becasue there is a breater risk of life to the woman, even if only a small one, I think it should be up to the woman to choose. It is very wrong to force a woman to have a child and take on that risk against her will for an unwanted pregnancy.

1

I can't think of one good non-religious reason to prevent first trimester abortions. Third trimester sure, but that's not really a thing, even if the religious extremists insist it is.

3

Even when I was a Catholic, I was pro-choice.

4

My belief that it's Your body and others should Butt Out is not rooted in any philosophy, just common sense/decency.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:58134
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.