Agnostic.com

3 3

The events taking place in Christianity revolve around the Middle East.

The events taking place in Islam revolve around the Middle East.

The events taking place in Hinduism revolve around the Indian Subcontinent.

The events taking place in Judaism revolve around the Middle East.

The events taking place in Hellenism (Ancient Greek religion) revolve around Greece.

The events taking place in Kemetism (Ancient Egyptian religion) revolve around Egypt.

The events taking place in Sikhism revolve around the Indian Subcontinent.

The events taking place in Norse Paganism revolve around Scandinavia (Nordic Europe).

The events taking place in Zoroastrianism revolve around Persia (Modern day Iran).

The events taking place in Dreamtime (Aboriginal Australian religion) revolve around Australia.

Just like the religions mentioned above, there are around 5,000 religions on Earth. All those religions, their stories, the events mentioned in them revolve around the geographical location where they originated.

Yet the believers of all these religions have the audacity to say that their god or gods created the Earth and Universe despite the fact that at the time of the origin of these religions, the people didn't know shit about the other side of the world, let alone the universe.

All religions are fictional fairy tales.

Monty13 4 May 10
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

One fallacy of your statement there is the ignorance fallacy. One thing you do is stereotype these different things into what you call "religion ".

For example, an argument based on stereotype is an example of ignorance fallacy. Such an argument is persuasive because the audience wants to believe what their prejudice tells them is true.

[examples.yourdictionary.com]

Word Level 8 May 11, 2021

His post was well thought out, simply stated and logically consistent. Yours was none of those things. The phrase “word salad” comes to mind....

@NostraDumbass would you like salad dressing on that?

@Word Sophistry Salad gives me Intellectual Indigestion. Would prefer some Low-Cal Logic instead.

0

How does that refute the existence of god.

He wasn’t attempting to disprove the existence of God. He was attempting to demonstrate that all our venerable religions look exactly like what you would expect if they were superstitious inventions of primitive cultures with limited knowledge of the world. And he did a very good job of it. Kudos!

0

Here’s the Reader’s Digest condensed version of your post: To be religious is to live in a bubble. (See that dog sitting on my lap? His name is Monty. Coincidence? Maybe...)

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:595635
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.