Your comment and sentiment is uncalled for.

@Ello You are right. She should have told you to go fuck yourself, but she is much nicer than I am, so go fuck yourself!

@Sticks48 What is your problem?
Actually what are both of your problems??

"If we are going to live in a world of acceptance, love, and peace, then that has to be the model of all pinning for such."

The common actions which portrayed are again mirrored out into the world, spread about, and reflected. You reap what you sow.

You all though, who commented hate, on the other hand, alienated the commentator through your aggression. You, again or someone else will reap what you sow eventually.

@Sticks48 What is wrong with you? Are you that closed minded, you both seem to be.

@Ello No, because your post was stupid. I have no tolerance for stupid. It might be a short coming of mine, but it is mine and l am OK with it.

@Sticks48 yawn. How childish.

@Ello And factual. Aren't "facts" what you are about? Guess not. According to your twisted logic men who are born sterile and women born infertile aren't really men and women. Your ability for critical thinking is sorely lacking.

@Sticks48 (Repost from this very same page, lower in the comments.)

"Okay, firstly, that is not agreed upon, active reproduction does not make one a full woman or man, yet being born one sex or the other does make one a full woman or man from birth to death."

@Ello Again, you ignore the science. You sound more like a believer than a non believer.

That's not what the OP is alluding to, and no, that does not make one a full woman or man. The lack of reproduction, is, however the naturally born inability to reproduce that is authentic.

@Ello "not what the OP is alluding to...." The first 2 (very large) paragraphs blatted on & on about how trans can have surgically-made organs that look & act fine but they cannot mimic reproduction.....did you Read it in its entirety? Because your remarks indicate otherwise!

@AnneWimsey No, the OP is about living in a world of reality, living in facts. It is factual that a man can not fully, biologically, transition to a woman. So why would anyone think that such is possible? It's not, and thinking such is possible is a fictitious thought. The question is why, would anyone take one lie, any lie, over the other.

What, are you all to self centered and absorbed to not understand that the OP is about so much more.

@Ello ROFLMAO, just wow, you are completely missing the point that reproduction per se does not, nor should, define Anyone. It's true, you really cannot read!

@AnneWimsey
Also, such childish responses coming from people 'standing up for trans people'.

Now, that seems to pertain to your stance, for you had bypassed the comment before and redirected the conversation in your own direction again.

Okay, firstly, that is not agreed upon, active reproduction does not make one a full woman or man, yet being born one sex or the other does make on a full woman or man from birth to death.

You got it, this will be the post.

@Ello I check my link when there is one to make sure it works, and always check for double posting.

@xenoview alright.

I've always contended that if men could become pregnant, there would be abortion clinics at every intersection. They'd all provide free services, and serve wings and beer, post-op.
There would also be big screen TVs on every wall, showing "the game".