You're nuts.

@Vancan62 atheism is still illogical.

The 2 paragraphs below are copied from link provided. I am making this comment to distinguish between proper nouns, common nows and proper names.

What I see a lot with Illogical atheist in theie illogical debates and a part of what makes the debates illogical is bouncing between "what" god is and "who" god is.

Pointing out historically that "we" as also called people, are gods. This shows what gods are, as to who, you are a what? Or, lets me rhetorically as, what are you versus, who are you? Apart of illogical atheist debates are saying that "God" is not expected to exist and meet the atheist say,"Hello, my name is God". God is not the proper name compared to calling someone Bob, because Bob is on their birth certificate. This is not to say, an all-powerful "entity" could4put "God" on a record of certificate for existence as being its name. But, it is generally looked upon as "God" is a title like president, king, mechanic, cook, etc. That indentifies "what" a "who" is.

Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods"’? John 10:34

Gods exist, atheism illogical.

A distinction is normally made in current linguistics between proper nouns and proper names. By this strict distinction, because the term noun is used for a class of single words (tree, beauty), only single-word proper names are proper nouns: Peter and Africa are both proper names and proper nouns; but Peter the Great and South Africa, while they are proper names, are not proper nouns (though they could be said to function as proper noun phrases). The term common name is not much used to contrast with proper name, but some linguists have used the term for that purpose. Sometimes proper names are called simply names, but that term is often used more broadly. Words derived from proper names are sometimes called proper adjectives (or proper adverbs, and so on), but not in mainstream linguistic theory. Not every noun or a noun phrase that refers to a unique entity is a proper name. Chastity, for instance, is a common noun, even if chastity is considered a unique abstract entity.

A proper noun is a noun that identifies a single entity and is used to refer to that entity, such as London, Jupiter, Sarah, or Microsoft, as distinguished from a common noun, which is a noun that refers to a class of entities (city, planet, person, corporation) and may be used when referring to instances of a specific class (a city, another planet, these persons, our corporation).[1][2][3][4] Some proper nouns occur in plural form (optionally or exclusively), and then they refer to groups of entities considered as unique (the Hendersons, the Everglades, the Azores, the Pleiades). Proper nouns can also occur in secondary applications, for example modifying nouns (the Mozart experience; his Azores adventure), or in the role of common nouns (he's no Pavarotti; a few would-be Napoleons). The detailed definition of the term is problematic and, to an extent, governed by convention.[5][6. [en.m.wikipedia.org]