Agnostic.com

4 0

This makes the facts a bit clearer

CourtJester 7 Aug 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Village Idiot is at it again. Old articles, misinformation, outright deception,... He's not even very good at it & always brags about how smart he is ('stable genius' anyone?) & how much money he (supposedly) makes (does that remind you of anyone, too?).
A tRump wannabe without even the personality of the Orange Turd, as twisted as that was...

2

People call it a hoax because they are ignorant.

1

If you cannot even spell the key word ("HAOX"???) properly, how can anybody take this Very old post seriously?

2

Maybe it doesn't matter, but this Free Beacon article is over a year old. It covered a different time in the pandemic. So it may have been an unwise short-term exemption, but it's not a "HAOX".

IV. EXCEPTIONS

  1. Wearing a mask is not required when:

a. A person is a resident or guest in a private home or apartment;
b. A person is actually eating, drinking, or legally smoking;
c. A person is engaged in vigorous outdoor exercise and is maintaining social distance of at least six (6) feet from each other person;
d. A person is in the water at a swimming pool;
e. A person is in an enclosed office that no one else is permitted to enter;
f. A person is aged two (2) years old or younger;
g. A person is unable to wear a mask due to a medical condition or disability, or is physically unable to remove a mask;
h. A person is giving a speech for broadcast or an audience, provided no one is within six feet of the speaker;
i. A deaf or hard of hearing person needs to read the lips of a speaker;
j. The equipment required for a job precludes the wearing of a mask and the person is wearing that equipment, or when wearing a mask would endanger public safety;
k. A person has been lawfully asked to remove the mask for facial recognition purposes.
2. The enforcement provisions of this Order shall not be applied to persons in the judicial or legislative branches of the District government while those persons are on duty; and shall not apply to any employees of the federal government while they are on duty.

@CourtJester As partisan as you are, I don’t trust you to tell the truth.

@yvilletom I totally agree, CourtJester has posted too much BS for too long!

@yvilletom, @AnneWimsey Village Idiot is a legend in his own mind. The only thing he is somewhat good at is cherry picking 'facts' after he has gleaned them from NewsMax, OAN & MyPillow Lindell. He doesn't know how to tell the truth...

@yvilletom Then look it up yourself and read a little

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:613637
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.