Agnostic.com

4 4

He's still a threat..
[rawstory.com]

Charlene 9 Nov 11
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Or at least one of his parasites is still feeding off him.

2

Glad to see who is in charge. Idiots abound and some other idiot has to lead them.

3

Dem's need to stop showing fear of him. That's what his Tribe feeds on; our fear. Start confronting him directly. If we can't beat such an ugly POS, both inside and out, then Democrats don't deserve to rule. Something about us is so lacking that we can't rise above whatever our ugliness is. I think it's exactly what the Con's complain most about, our smug elitism (which we call humor), and sense of liberal ego. We are liberals and anyone who disagrees with us is surely a racist or misogynist POS. No honest argument can be made because we liberals speak from fact and knowledge of all science. We are fair to a fault so just do as we are telling you. Does anyone see how that can be annoying?

The Dems need to crush him..especially Garland..they need to Clean House of feeble spined Modetates, this is pandering to the Holy Grail of "Bipartisanship" needs to Stop. It's time to turn the tables on Rethugs and use Bitch McCornholes playbook..

@Charlene After all the criticism of Barr our POTUS can not go tell Garland what to do. Joyce Vance feels he's being prudent in taking time to get Bannon/Insurrection cases right and she knows far more than I do. We got 19 Con's on POTUS Joe's first big bill so it seems to me that actual progress is being made through his efforts. If Dem's don't like McCornhole then why would we want to use his playbook? Because it has been brilliantly effective against us? First off, this is ML Chuck's Department and I'm unsure what he's doing. Second, individual abilities are what we call "Talent" whether we like how it's used or not. I don't believe Warhol is art but does that mean he wasn't talented? No.
We seem to be caught between the proverbial rock and hard place. Hopefully it works out "But thank God I'm only watching the game/controlling it." (That's from One Night In Bangkok).

4

Still a treat?
Until he's rendered harmless somehow, he is THE threat.

If the Justice Dept. doesn't come down on him like Thor's hammer, we will be living in a fascist regime shortly. Merrick Garland: WAKE UP!

I am sorry but I cannot see how we are going to alleviate this problem. There is just to much stupidity, those who are able to answer this cause have no power and are afraid to insult someone who definitely needs to be insulted. If we cannot take control and lessen the power of the stupid we just are not going to make it. Are we here just so we can burn it all down and watch everyone die?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:633374
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.