Agnostic.com

5 9

I've long believed that when the Earth was hit by another planet, billions of years ago which formed the moon, all that material blew out of the Pacific Ocean, like the way the back of a watermelon blows out a chunk if you shoot it from the other side.
I think the Hawaii volcanic hot spot is a ballistic artifact from the collision.
This link is a 3D map of earthquakes at their depth.
After seeing the map please tell me what you think of my ballistic theory of Moon formation.

[glowy-earthquakes.glitch.me]

Willow_Wisp 8 Nov 24
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

First, an AMAZING map!! Entertaining theory also. Given that the event would have occurred at the very earliest stages of earth's formation it's going to take some doing to find evidence. BUT there was a man who postulated the land formations in Eastern WA State were formed not by erosion but by a massive flood. He was laughed out of the Geologic Society. Not until flight was possible did geologists realize he was correct. Now they know it was not just one flood but a series of floods.
The fluid nature of the plate movements and what happens to those large chunks as they either move down into the earth or fracture up forming new peaks is exposed as we find new ways to detect elements.
Things to think about.

2

I didn't know that . Thanks for the info.

3

It's possible, but from what I've read the collision wasn't a direct hit..

I keep reading the same, but I think it was a more direct collision.
The depth of the earthquakes on the map are exaggerated by a factor of 8.
Yet, 660+ miles down is still hundreds of miles deeper than geologist believed earthquakes could happen and reveals structure that's unexpected.
Earthquakes are supposed to be reserved to the crust and just below it.
We're detecting earthquakes to the depth of the lower mantel.
So it superficially seems to support my thoughts on the matter.

4

According to conventional versions of the theory, the collision caused total melting of the earth, so that no crust remained and a solid crust only formed afterwards, so there would be no mark left. Also, the Pacific ocean is thought to have been formed by plate tectonics, only after the break up of the last two super continent events and is therefore much more recent. The volcanic activity around it is usually regarded a proof of its recent continuing growth.

I think though, that there is a hidden agenda behind this question.

4

What would the bullet have been in your scenario?

You have to wind that map backwards in time 4-plus billion years. The land masses have floated around quite a bit to get where they are now. The notion that the Pacific Basin is the source of the Moon looks possible. The Hawaiian hot spot is the most prominent hot spot, but there are many more in the South Pacific. Their cause remains unknown or I've never heard it. The images of these volcano chains are intriguing.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:635579
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.