I may be taking the piss of course...

Every Democrat president has been a Christian too. They also stand in front of the nation saying God talk too.

@Tejas It's one thing to talk about one's beliefs in public, it's quite another to make laws and rule a country based on an individual's beliefs. Islamic theocratic countries clearly illustrate this.

I am aware the constitution limits the government in some ways. I am suggesting a law that is equal and balanced in both directions. And most specifically what our elected representatives can do and say in the execution of their duties

@DaCrusher
“ I am suggesting a law that is equal and balanced in both directions.”

Which “both directions”?

The law you referred to is the 1st Amendment to the constitution? Yes? If so, I would agree that it prohibits government representatives from establishing or interfering with religion, yet it is happening everyday and a great deal of the time. Is your thought then that the 1st Am. is not properly informed or due feel that, for instance... A Rep. from Geogia can discuss what the definition of their God is?

@DaCrusher

First amendment, yes.

The problem has been interpretation, which will go on forever. Here is a brief history of that interpretation:
[mtsu.edu]

The law is a living, moving thing, that will always be changing (in democratic governments) according to current majority public sentiments mediated by precedent.

But that same law also protects free speech, so individual lawmakers are legally free to express their religious sentiments. And voters are free to vote them out.

@DaCrusher

Technically speaking, the First Amendment doesn’t prohibit “government representatives from establishing or interfering with religion”.

It prohibits Congress from making a law. The individual representatives can say or do whatever they please.