Agnostic.com

2 6

The GOP is doubling down on its secession from reality. This is not going to end well. Republican party calls January 6 attack ‘legitimate political discourse’: [theguardian.com]

Druvius 8 Feb 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

SCOTUS on fighting words:

Fighting words are words meant to incite violence such that they may not be protected free speech under the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court first defined them in Chaplinsky v New Hampshire (1942) as words which "by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
Source: Cornell Law School

1

That is why it is critical that the media disclose that insurrectionists were heavily armed.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:648980
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.