Agnostic.com

5 7

Yes. How come???

Sierra4 8 June 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Because America has a unique sort of toxic masculinity that the gun makers and Repub pols have combined to aggressively market guns to men, esp. young men, in a way that makes them feel more masculine, superior, and more powerful than other men, and esp. women, by owning and using guns. It's not much different than how large pickup trucks and guns are also marketed to women, who buy and use both of them in order to feel more powerful and less vulnerable, esp. to men, by having these toys..

And as long as there is so much profit for the gun makers, and so much political benefit for the Repub Party to oppose gun laws, the gun laws will never fundamentally change. Lastly, as Chris Hedges said so eloquently today, and Obama spoke about years ago, to many people on the right, owning guns and having their fundamentalist religion are, they feel, the only power or rights they have left under our corrupt system where the corporations and the government dictate everything else in their lives. They feel powerless against the corporations and the government, so they cling to their religion and guns for emotional comfort, because at least, in their minds, the government and corporations have taken everything else from them.

And they are mostly right. Hedges also talks about the toxic mythology that white Americans, esp. males, have about how they came to dominate America and how much they need to fear those of other races that their ancestors oppressed and will surely take revenge on them once whites are outnumbered here, unless the whites arm themselves enough to defeat and protect themselves from them. Hedges says the country has two paths, civil war or a modern New Deal like FDR's to finally improve the lives of the underclass and restore some balance of equality in America, but he feels the choice has already been made by the elite and everyone who is not part of the ruling elite or the reactionary white right wing of America will be collateral damage, as everyone not in the latter group, such as racial minorities, queer people, liberals, intellectuals, etc., the same people targeted by Hitler, will be hunted down or killed by the right wingers, while the ruling elite stay safe behind their gated communities, their security forces, the FBI, the police and the military. The rest of us don't matter and we are all expendable to them. They will still have their servants while they wait out the civil war.

1

Instead, let’s talk about what compels them to take such action? How have they been traumatized, or desensitized? Completely sane people do not do these things, regardless of gender.

3

Yes, some (far too many) men have an inability to deal with life/reality with anything but violence. I think this may change in time, but it will take at least a generation or more. The attitude of "boys will be boys" and the expectation that boys and men should embrace and admire violence while repressing and shunning physical affection (aside from sexual) needs to change.

1

Because you're not going to be able to stop men's inability to control their emotions with legislation, but you may be able to reduce the ease in which they are capable of acting on it.

Reduce both the ease of acting on it and also the severity of how much damage they can do when they act on it. It's pretty hard to kill a dozen people with a knife in a attack during a short time, for example. It's very much the same argument as those for civil rights laws and hate crime laws. You cannot legislate away prejudice or hate, but you can criminalize the actions of those who hate or act with prejudice, with enough force or punishment to deter them from acting in those ways. But only if the laws end up being consistently enforced and followed up with serious sentences.

Of course, many or most mass killers do not act rationally and are not concerned about legal penalties because they kill themselves before being captured or have no desire to survive their attack, they only care about killing as many as they can, many desire to commit suicide by cop...

0

Jennifer San Marco
Nasim Aghdam
Brenda Spencer
Amy Bishop
Laurie Dann

I fear a list that short only strengthens the argument in the original post. Often when a woman does fire a gun, she's doing so in the process of protecting herself from a violent man.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:670021
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.