Agnostic.com

4 6

Nowadays, many, maybe even most of us do not live in the world described by science, but in some kind of "Fantasyland". In his eponymous book, Kurt Andersen describes and explains how we arrived at this point. The pivotal moment, he argues, was the sixties:

"What the left and right respectively love and hate are mostly flip sides of the same coins minted around 1967. All the ideas we call countercultural barged onto the cultural main stage in the 1960s and ’70s, it’s true, but what we don’t really register is that so did extreme Christianity, full-blown conspiracism, libertarianism, unembarrassed greed, and more. Anything goes meant anything went.
(...)

A kind of unspoken grand bargain was forged between the anti-Establishment and the Establishment. Going forward, individuals would be permitted as never before to indulge their self-expressive and hedonistic impulses. But capitalists in return would be unshackled as well, free to indulge their own animal spirits with fewer and fewer fetters in the forms of regulation, taxes, or social opprobrium. “Do your own thing” has a lot in common with “Every man for himself.” If it feels good, do it: for some that will mean smoking weed and watching porn—and for others, opposing modest gun regulation and paying yourself four hundred times what you pay your employees. (...)

The idea that finally eclipsed all competing ideas was a notion of individualism that was as old as America itself, liberty and the pursuit of happiness unbound: Believe the dream, mistrust authority, do your own thing, find your own truth. In America from the late 1960s on, equality came to mean not just that the law should treat everyone identically but that your beliefs about anything are equally as true as anyone else’s. As the principle of absolute tolerance became axiomatic in our culture and internalized as part of our psychology—
What I believe is true because I want and feel it to be true—individualism turned into rampant solipsism."

Matias 8 June 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Meeeh... I'm not buying it. 😜

0

I don't know anything about Kurt Andersen apart from he is an American journalist. If your post is based on his world view, then it is probably an American-centric view of the world. Do you think his view also describes German society?

Ryo1 Level 8 June 27, 2022

Anderson's story is about the American political reaction to ideas espoused during American 60's/70's. It is not, repeat NOT, about the influence to any society outside that of America (even though it might have some application for them). To make it about Germany, or any nation outside America, is outlandish (IMO).

@Matias Interesting. Thanks for yoru insight.

3

Sadly, moral degeneration goes back much further than the, so called, social revolution of the sixties. If you find a child is stealing, and you explain to it carefully why it is wrong to steal, and the objective reality of why widespread stealing would make for a very unhappy world, which it would not want to live in, then you have some chance it will learn better. If however you tell it not to steal because the bogey man will get it, then sadly, when it inevitably comes to understand that the bogey man does not exist, as it will, then not only will it no longer be afraid to steal, it may even do so all the more in rebellion, because it was lied to, and the lier's views no longer hold credibility.

So western society, which until the middle of the nineteenth century based its morality, almost wholly on religious, theist, bogey man arguments, had to face the fact that beginning in that century, and especially through the moral crisis of two world wars, which exposed its weakness, the bogey man was going to be seen through and lose credibility. And with that the morals built on it, however good, were bound to lose credibility too.

And while the remnants of religion, see the modern and growing alternative moralities, such as humanism and environmentalism, with their more objective based sources, and transparently simple objectives, ( That even a child can understand. ) not as allies, but as competition, to be ruthlessly undermined, then moral decline is still likely.

2

Is freedom without responsibility freedom at all ?
FreeDumb or freedom?

twill Level 7 June 27, 2022

@K9Kohle789 I'm pretty sure that when I step on a nail or when my hit my finger with a hammer that it's real

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:673889
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.