Agnostic.com

5 6

It’s been an interesting day. In a previous posting about the Overpopulation Project I had an idea to exchange the latest essays with the Project group and FFRF (Freedom From Religion for those who may not know the group). In their latest ‘Freethought Today’ newsletter was a long printing by one Dan McCallum who was one of the children in the court case McCallum v. Board of Education. Here’s a link to Mr. McCallum essay: [freethoughttoday.com] and a printing of the essay.

”By Dan McCollum
Some years back, in a complete fit of anger and disgust with the human race over its sordid record of stupidity, violence and destruction, I began an essay that I titled, “Homo Sapiens, the Stupidest of the Great Apes.” After a dozen or more failed starts over the years, I found that I was unable to come to a coherent understanding how such a promising evolutionary start for a human race that could develop such beauty and brilliance could yet descend into a continuing state of chronic depravity. Finally, I have come to some possible understanding as to how this could have come about, somewhat alleviating my outrage."

"We find ourselves on a miniscule planet in a seemingly infinite universe on which conditions existed that allowed life, living organisms, to develop — liquid water surrounding solid land masses with abundant mineral resources at a proper distance from a star that provided energy. After many millions of years, from the simplest of early life forms, in a process we have come to call evolution, a complex of diversified organisms has come about, eventually including mammals — and us. Absolutely no scientifically verifiable evidence exists regarding any supernatural power playing any part in the above circumstances."

"In human evolution, our closest living relatives are chimpanzees. We, as they, are members of a group known today as the Great Apes. A break occurred when our ancestors diverged, becoming bipeds when our former front legs became arms. For the first time, the evolutionary, natural process creating life on Earth chanced to produce a race of creatures eventually equipped both physically and mentally to become a force for change quite apart from the process that had created it. Like our cousins the chimps, we are social creatures, but unfortunately, like our ape ancestors, we are also burdened with a predisposition toward male-oriented dominance, partly owing to size, but with an inadequate counterbalance to male aggressiveness."

"Most of humanity’s 200,000 years on the planet were spent in a slow process of expanding over virtually all inhabitable surfaces. Discovering the Promethian gift of fire, humans formed into bands and then tribes, and developed primitive skills for survival. As groups disbursed in relative isolation from one another, they developed unique peculiarities in culture and language. Over time and geographic dispersal, differences and conflicts were inevitable."

"For most of humanity’s time, we have been a benign presence in regard to our load on the planet, gradually allowing us to become increasingly competitive as we sought to survive. It was only after the early development of agriculture, likely just 13,000 years ago, that settled populations of humans began to collect. These assemblages of human intellectual interchange accelerated change, innovation and technology. The result gave humans increasing access to the wealth of the planet, expanding competition among our kind for control of space and resources. City states morphed into regional empires, creating what has come to be called “civilization.” As human populations increased and dispersed, differences in culture and languages were inevitable. All this “progress” was marked by a growth in what Robert Burns called “man’s inhumanity to man” — the expansion of interspecies rivalry, warfare, subjugation of women and slavery."

"No command from on high was necessary for humans to be fruitful and multiply. Fast forward to 1798, when a numbers guy anonymously published his “Essay on the Principal of Population.” Thomas Malthus predicted that the growth of food production could not indefinitely support the disproportionate birth rate of his fellow humans. His second statement, following in 1803, brought additional credibility to his predictions. While alarming far more people than actually read his writings, the world did not end. All this even before Charles Darwin figured out how we really got here."

"I was born barely less than two years before the German invasion of Poland, the start of World War II, and four years and two months before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, putting my country into the most murderous war in human history. While the war ended in 1945, we have lived under the threat of nuclear annihilation through the Cold War from two powers with atomic capabilities to eight or more today."

"All the while there was more bad news: In 1896, Swedish geophysicist Svante Arrhenius was the first scientist to identify the relationship between the amount of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere and global temperatures, that a rise in the percentage of carbon dioxide would be related to a rise in temperature. Rapid increases in access to and use of fossil fuels in the last 250 years is directly related to human activity. Global warming has led to glacial melting and consequent release of the stored methane present in arctic permafrost, which has now become another major greenhouse gas, promoting rising ocean levels."

"Some experts believe that the possibility for collective human action to arrest the mounting catastrophe of global warming must occur this century or the problem will be irreversible. Given the current antagonistic state of human affairs, that possibility seems remote."

"The human population, facilitated by technology, ballooned to an estimated 8 billion people in this 21st century! In no way can our planet indefinitely and comfortably support anything remotely close to that load at any level of ongoing sustainability. Thinkers over time have raised concerns only to be blithely ignored, confronted by a general weakness in both human judgment and reflection. Progress, driven unwittingly by intelligence and opportunity, but without the ability to anticipate long term consequences, has led to where we now are."

"I have lost my anger. Our plight was inevitable. We are defenseless against ourselves. It is a classic Greek tragedy, played out from its onset 200,000 years back to the present, a situation not destined to end well. Pogo was right, “We have met the enemy and they are us.”

FFRF Member Dan McCollum was one of the children at the heart of the landmark court case, McCollum v. Board of Education, in the 1940s that halted religious indoctrination classes in public schools.

jackjr 7 Oct 21
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Excellent point. I don't believe that we can address climate change without addressing population growth. It won't do us any good to cut our carbon emissions in half if we double out population.

This whole issue is basically a corporate driven one. In our constant growth economic model the sky will come crashing if we don't stop increasing our population. Unfortunately, corporations have the money and can overwhelm the world with their world (business) views.

1

Right, I arrived at a similar conclusion some time ago……👀

2

Overpopulation. Does this mean we can start killing others for that reason or should we all agree we are humans on the planet?

We already are but are finding other excuses.

2

What I love about this is how it illustrates the fact that deeper knowledge alleviates anger and blame, leading to some greater degree of psychological peace.

What the future actually holds for us is unknowable. We have survived many existential crises in the past. I suspect that if we survive the next one it won't be without a devastating bottleneck event.

skado Level 9 Oct 21, 2023

It probably will be but unlike the asteroid that killed off the dinosaurs it will be of our own making. Maybe rats will inherit the Earth. Of course they breed even faster than us but they don't have near the impact.

3

This is an excellent commentary on our status. I believe that our nature is bound to destroy most of us by wars and starvation. We never consider our future or our descendants. Coal was made for about 60 million years until nature discovered how to eat lignum. No coal was made after that. Sure there is lots of coal but once burned up it is gone. Oil we have now long ago used up more than half of it. We do not know how to live without these minerals yet we blithely use them up without thinking of 7 generations hence. We would rather condemn ourselves than think of the future.

I grew up hearing the national (I suspect global) idea "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" This time when it breaks there will be no fix.

@jackjr And how many people do you encounter who have 3 or more children or even 3 or more through different marriages? When you and I were born the world population was slightly more than 2 billion. Few people had cars. But I was of 4 children as many more were dooming a doubling. Then I found families of 12 children. And the republicans wand lots more.

@rogerbenham Right, the asshats can’t fathom that maybe abortion is a good thing given the current ecological state of our planet…..😶

@Buck I think part of their problem is that they see coloured people being in the majority and fear loss of the WASP privilege. So maybe they should have made abortions illegal for whites only!!!!

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:734711
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.