First off, no one group has a monopoly on being arseholes. They exist in all walks, creeds and colours, to deny this is racist in of itself. What really marks the difference is the impact of such arseholery. For example: Say we had two supermarket employees, both equally sexist and racist but one was the store manager and the other the trolly dolly. We can see how HR would want to deal with the former PDQ whilst the latter could mutter under his breath all day long. Similarly, straight white males whilst they may occasionally encounter some form of discrimination, are unlikely to have it seriously affect their employment prospects and are far from being underrepresented in government.
Victim groups are generally the province of the right. It is they who are constantly clutching their pearls and hurling accusations of bias eg Trump's "witchhunts, left-wing media and one site member who will remain nameless (cough, CourtJester) who claimed that Google was left-wing biased. Whereas the left tends to be too busy righting actual wrongs and trying to make our society more of a meritocracy than it otherwise might be. ( a goal that you might think a free-market ideology might aspire to).
This notion of victimology can only be viewed as an easy cop-out by the establishment. Rather than addressing any real problems and inequality in society. Take any criticism of Israel for example, to say it all stems from antisemitism is as spurious as denying there may be elements that are.
The right so often loses all of its credibility. They talk a big game about freedom etc, but when confronted with actual instances of oppression, they close ranks and fall into racist troupes. Eg The George Floyd case. One might think an ideology that espoused small government and individual freedom might be equally aggrieved by an actual cop's knee on an actual citizen's neck regardless of their race. One might consider Fox News calling on the party of Lincoln to join in BLM protests instead of vilifying them and engaging in victim blaming, Sadly this was not the case and if it were an isolated incident, there would be no discussion here. Is it any wonder how many black people might not like us as a bunch?
Of course, we could all just pretend that racism, antisemitism, misogyny, and anti-LGBTQ+ no longer exist within our best-of-all possible worlds and any talk of such is blatant victimology. This would be very convenient for the ruling elite as the status quo would be permanently maintained and none of their privileges that they deem as rights would be in danger.

"Progressive" is an irrelevant term. This term has been claimed by so many people with opposing ideologies, it is completely useless, as are the arguments for and against "progressive" ideologies.

Ummmm, what?

1. Who would ever want to be in either of these positions? A "Victim group" is not the same as an individual victim, no, we call them Oppressed.
2. Nothing about any category is static, ever. Look at Women from the 40's, ( and now actually regressing IMO!) gays/Trans etc from just 20 years ago, and so on. Therefore any statement,such as above, about them is basically false at any moment in time.
3. How do you think lynching of black men for smiling at a white woman fits into this supposition?

Logic? Intersectionality?