Agnostic.com

4 2

Taxi Driver, once again. It holds up, but not perfectly. I don't see it as uncritically as I did in the seventies. If DeNiro's Travis Bickle is so repulsed by the night-time street life of seventies New York City, and so drawn to the purity he thinks he sees in Cybil Shepherd's Betsy, would he really make a habit of going to X-rated, hardcore films, and—what is even weirder—take Betsy to one? And why does he turn against Palantine? Is it a matter of “If I can't have Betsy for a girlfriend, he can't have her (political) allegiance, because he'll be dead”? I don't know. Maybe. Palantine may be a phony but there's no indication that Travis's political antennae, if he even has any, are especially sensitive. As for the massacre near the end, it is plausible that Travis would carry it out; it is not plausible that Harvey Keitel's character would keep coming after Travis after being shot point-blank in his midsection. And the aftermath of the massacre, when Travis has killed three men with no legal consequences and become a media hero—well, it more or less went down that way with Kyle Rittenhouse, not to mention that Zimmerman character. But those cases took place in a political and legal landscape shaped by an ascendant racist/fascist right wing. I would think that in Ford-era New York City, the legal system would look at three murders as three murders, even if the deceased were themselves criminal. Of course I don't know that much about seventies New York City, except that it was crime-ridden and going broke. Maybe the system would have gone easy on Travis, but I doubt there would have been no charges at all.
Anyway...the film still works, due in no small part to the performances of the four principals. DeNiro, Shepherd, Foster and Keitel are good-to-excellent. But I don't think you have to sacrifice plausibility to put across a story of a man so lonely and pissed off that he's bound to erupt in a hail of ordnance. Such men are legion, more so now than in 1976. It is interesting that nowadays the men who would marry their guns if they could seem to come more from suburban and rural places than from places like New York City. Terence Malick might have seen that coming; I don't know that Paul Schrader or Scorsese did. Although, come to think of it, Schrader conceived of Travis as a transplant from the Midwest.

AlanCliffe 6 Feb 13
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Taxi driver confused me. Somehow I connected it with the guy who had a fetish towards Jody Foster. The dates would have been wrong for this to e correct.

I think you're thinking of John Hinckley, who shot Reagan in order to impress Jodie Foster in the early 80s. He was inspired, at least in part, by the film, which came out in 1976.

1

Saw it once, never again, was too hard to watch the first time. Great acting or not the subject matter was rough.

1

I hated Taxi Driver then and hate it now, its' world view was repulsive to me at best, and stuff like the porn movies that you ably point out make No sense. Bleh.
Although a harbinger of the rampant gun and other violence that disrupts life everywhere today.

0

And don't forget Bernard Hermann's incredible score...

Yes. Arguably a little portentous in some of the tenser scenes, but there are moments when the saxophones give a hint, if you want to hear it, that NYC isn't a TOTAL pile of garbage.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:746497
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.