Agnostic.com

6 8

19 Reasons Why Atheists Say They Don’t Believe in God
by Jane Andrews

How many do you agree with?

[criticalfinancial.com]

In case you don't want to click the link, here is the article.

Atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods and is a growing demographic around the world. While some atheists come from religious backgrounds and have since lost their faith, others were raised with a more fact-based or scientific approach and were skeptical from the start. Wherever the origin, here are the 19 most common reasons for atheism.

Lack of Evidence

The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy states that many atheists find the lack of concrete proof of a higher being makes them distrustful of religion. Many atheists assert that the absence of objective, scientific evidence for the existence of any deities shows that religion is based on ‘blind faith’ and outdated religious texts rather than logical thought.

The Problem of Evil

The existence of suffering and evil in the world is a massive hurdle for atheists when considering the concept of a benevolent and omnipotent God. If such a being exists, why do innocent people suffer? Why did He create human beings yet also create viruses and parasites that harm them? What did a baby born in a war zone ever do to deserve such suffering?

Multiple Deities

Throughout history, countless religions have emerged, each with its own creation story, moral code, and idea of the afterlife. Atheists wonder: if so many religions are made up, why do theists believe so fervently that their religion is the one true answer? The vast number of contradictory beliefs makes it difficult for atheists to accept the absolute truth claims of any one faith.

Lack of Inherent Belief

Children aren’t born inherently religious—they tend to copy the traditions and beliefs of their parents and communities. The Richard Dawkins Foundation asserts that teaching children to be critical thinkers naturally leads to atheism and the development of their own moral code. Atheists see this as proof that theism is neither inherent nor necessary.

The Burden of Proof

Atheists claim that the “burden of proof” lies with religion and reject the idea that the non-existence of God needs to be proved. If someone claims they saw a dragon or a unicorn, that person would have to show proof—rather than expecting other people to verify that such beings did not exist.

The Inconsistency of Religious Texts

The Bible, Quran, Torah, and other religious texts often contain contradictions, inconsistencies, and historical inaccuracies that are explained away by the devout as ‘tests’ of faith, hidden messages, or non-literal lessons. Atheists see such discrepancies as proof that such texts are the outdated creation of long-dead men and not divinely sacred.

Religious Dogma

Organized religions often present a set of unchangeable beliefs or tenets that followers are expected to accept without question, even in light of more progressive social attitudes or scientific discoveries. Atheists, who often value reason, modernization, and critical thinking, find this blind, dogmatic approach incompatible with their way of understanding the world.

Useless Prayers

Even the New York Times says prayers are useless without action, and herein lies the sticking point for many atheists. If God exists and is all-powerful, why is prayer so ineffective? If two devout people pray for opposite events, who gets their way? While the sentiment behind prayers for healing, peace, and love is noble, atheists know they have no benefit beyond that.

The Argument from Occam’s Razor

The ‘law of parsimony’ suggests that the simplest explanation is generally correct. So, religion was likely created by ignorant human civilizations that lacked the knowledge to explain scientific phenomena and biological processes. The idea of eternal damnation after death was also vital for controlling embryonic societies before law enforcement existed.

The Focus on Faith over Reason

Many religions emphasize ‘blind faith’ as a core tenet and dissuade followers from free-thinking, questioning long-held beliefs, or seeking evidence. Atheists, on the other hand, value reason, logic, and evidence-based explanations. They often find scientific experimentation and the flexible evolution of ideas over time to be a more rational and intelligent approach.

Personal Experiences

Many devout individuals have a religious upbringing or some coincidental event that ‘confirmed’ their belief. Yet, many atheists are more skeptical and lack the personal experiences that make a spiritual lifestyle unavoidable. Living ‘without God’ and experiencing the benefits of free thought and a sense of personal morality without drawbacks further reinforces this.

The History of Religious Violence

Religion has been used throughout history to justify violence, oppression, and discrimination, often on a massive and terrible scale. Atheists who study things like the continuing conflict in the Middle East, African genocides, or ‘holy wars’ often wonder whether religion is simply being weaponized as an excuse for human beings to commit atrocities toward others.

The Incompatibility of Science and Religion

For educated, critical thinkers, good science offers an ever-changing knowledge bank based on actual observations and the results of controlled experiments. Many atheists see this cold, clinical approach as an intelligent and logical way to answer questions and, therefore, reject religion due to its unscientific and unfounded claims.

The Hypocrisy of Man

Many high-ranking religious officials have been found guilty of corruption, theft, discrimination, and other hypocrisies, and yet they are all too often shielded from punishment by the institutions they help control. Many atheists see such events (such as child abuse by Catholic priests) as proof of the farcical, overly powerful, and manmade nature of religious institutions.

Discrimination and Hate Speech

Many ancient religious texts perpetuate discrimination against people of other religions, sexual orientations, or lifestyles. While this may have been accepted in the past, modern society is less accepting and less tolerant of such blatant hate. Many atheists chose to conform to their own moral code rather than blindly follow such discriminatory and outdated beliefs.

The Psychological Need for Religious Belief

Being logical and less emotional, some atheists suggest that religious belief stems from a human desire for comfort, purpose, and community. They argue that comforting and childish ideas, like the concept of heaven, aren’t alluring enough to persuade them to suspend their own beliefs and ignore scientific facts.

Anthropomorphism

Assigning human qualities and characteristics to a god (such as emotions, desires, and physical form) is a common feature of many religions, with gods frequently portrayed as vengeful or proud. Atheists argue that such emotions are human, not divine, proving mankind made their gods ‘in their own image’ and not the other way around.

Overly-Secretive Gods

If the Christian God, for example, truly exists and desires a relationship with humanity, why is He entirely absent? Theists conveniently assert that God is ‘testing’ His believers, which seems like a pretty manipulative and unhealthy thing for a (supposedly benevolent) God to do. Atheists don’t accept this explanation and see the invisibility of gods as proof of their fantasy nature.

The Evolution of Religion

Atheists who study human history recognize religion as an evolving cultural phenomenon. Religious beliefs and practices, and the way humans have worshiped their gods, have changed over time—with sacrifices and superstitions replaced by capitalistic ‘mega churches,’ for example. Atheists often think this human-led evolution proves a lack of divinity.

Julie808 8 Mar 26
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

While I agree with all of the reasons except 'The Problem of Evil' , some of them only disprove a beneficent god. I know many people whose concept of god is not moralistic. I don't agree with 'The Problem of Evil' in the abstract because I don't believe in Evil with a capital "E". And it also applies to a beneficent god. One of the biggest reasons I am an atheist is because the very concept is nonsense. The properties often attributed lead to contradiction (can he create a being more powerful than himself, can he know something he doesn't already know, etc). Even the idea of the 'supernatural'. If something exists it does so in the natural world. Saying something is supernatural is saying something is outside nature and natural law. Since natural law encompasses everything this doesn't make sense.

Yes, I can see Evil as a controversial subject if thinking of it as some spiritual entity that has to be battled by as supernatural deity.

Personally I view evil as a part of human nature, just as goodness is. Thankfully most of us are loving caring people, but those who have not been taught to care about other people, nor to discipline themselves to become better humans, can slip into doing evil things out of spite, hatred, jealousy, etc. We have some examples in our current culture of people doing evil things to other people out of revenge or greed, etc.

Those who think the problem of evil can be solved by a bible, starring a jealous and vengeful god, and especially one being hawked by an evil politician lately, need to think a bit more on it. Evil as a human construct can only be solved with human reason, compassion, education, social laws or other worldly ways, not supernatural forces.

@Julie808 Evil is not an entity…you cannot use the word as a noun, although sadly many do, but that is merely a religious construct.
Evil is an adjective…a word to describe a person or thing. Man can be evil, he can perpetrate an evil act, just as he can do a kind act. Evil is simply an antonym of good /kind …and is a synonym of bad/wicked.

@Marionville I don't really see it as a supernatural entity, but many people do, as you say. I do think that evil can be a noun, as the opposite of goodness perhaps. I was trying to say I think of evil as what is done by people doing things purposely to hurt others.

To me, it's a human creation, we can only hope that evil tendencies can be squashed and replaced with goodness, with human help. I don't see the bible and other religious texts too much as self help books.

1

All of the above. I'd also mention that the character of believers often leaves much to be desired (ill-tempered, sexually repressed, naieve, willfully ignorant, and a lot more...

4

Atheists do not CLAIM that the “burden of proof” lies with religion, that is an axiomatic fact, it is philosophically, lexicographically, logically and semantically so.

The only claim the self declared atheist makes that they are without god(s) (that is the exact meaning of the noun) and the only ways this can be proven to be so is by observation of action and declaration, or by the application of hypnotic barbiturate general anesthetics so called truth drugs, that lower inhibitions and increases suggestibility to such an extent that lying becomes almost imposable.

I think the intent was to say that atheists don't have to prove a negative, but that it is up to people who believe in supernatural phenomena to show evidence and proof of their claims. This is my view. It is certainly the case that some theists, and even some agnostics, unfortunately, try to claim that atheists should prove that God doesn't exist, which is ridiculous, not to mention that there are thousands of alleged gods, not just one.

@David1955
Exactly, the burden of proof ALWAY lays with the person or organisation positing the proposition, whether it be simple eg the angles of a triangle always add up to 180 degrees or metaphysical as in this case gods or at least one god actually exists.

@LenHazell53 Of course the burden of proof lies with the person or organisation propounding the belief regardless of what they contend. They continually ask us to prove disbelief which as we know is an impossibility. I can follow agnostics’ contention that atheists cannot say with 100% certainty that there is no god as lack of proof only confirms lack of proof not lack of god. However that is where logic and the laws of probability come into force and the best we can say as atheists is that when credible and verifiable evidence is brought to light that a god does exist, then we can and will alter our beliefs accordingly, however until then we cannot believe in the existence of a god or gods.

@Marionville
When theists and agnostics use the atheists cannot say with 100% certainty that there is no god as lack of proof only confirms lack of proof not lack of god contention, I simply ask them if they doubt the none existence of Unicorns, Leprechauns, poltergeists and Santa Claus invariably they say no so as not to look like a complete A. Hole, which allows me legitimately to ask what is the difference between their god or gods and anything else falling in to the imaginary fictions category, that have only story books and myths to support the abstract context of their existence.

5

Covers all the bases for me. Some will challenge some of these, like they don't believe it is possible to know if any God exists, or even what God means as a definition, but I don't find these sorts of rabbit holes convincing. So, the list works for me.

Expect some agnostics to raise issues, like the ones I mentioned, though.

5

Any and all of the above…and probably a few more too if I thought thoroughly and seriously about it. I did a lot of reading, pondering, and deeply trying to understand the God/gods myths, texts, histories etc., when I was in my early and late teens and came to the conclusion that any and all gods and attendant religions with their various strictures and dogmas are totally man made from a need to explain and therefore to control what we otherwise cannot explain or comprehend. In other words a human need to believe in something greater than ourselves, but because we can only conceive something from our human perspective we attribute to this greater entity - human, father-figure characteristics, we create our gods in our own image. Which means of course that far from being divine entities they are imbued with all the same attributes and deficits as we humans who are emotional beings. Love, greed, avarice, hate, revenge….all gods have these human qualities, nothing divine at all there then!

I’m now in my 70s and am long past pondering about whether there is a God/gods or not…having come to the inevitable conclusion that there is not - more than 60 years ago, and nothing since then has been able to convince me otherwise.

7

All of the above. Though I do think that their is some duplication in the list. For example, "The Inconsistency of Religious Texts." different religions give different versions of what divinity stands for, and "Multiple Deities" have a big overlap.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:751294
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.