I also disagree with all Cheney's policies. Vehemently. However I think the biggest problem our country faces is the constant othering and dehumanizing of each other based on politics. And you may be right. However I do think this would get most of the never Trumpers, disagree with you on that. And I think it would really make a difference based on sexism. Anyone sexist enough to refuse to vote for Harris when they don't want Trump would probably consider any male politician in a subsidiary position weak. I think the dynamic would turn off misogynists just as much as having a 2 woman ticket. Harris could pick Cheney for a first term and present examples of adults disagreeing amicably and effect some healing of our extreme partisanship and othering. She could pick someone else for a second term to continue her legacy, and if she didn't win a second term it probably wouldn't matter that Cheney was her first term VP. And I don't really see Cheney as dangerous since she will always work through our democratic framework and probably wouldn't be able to realize anything very far right. But best of all would be Trump loosing to them.
Also, while I think Trump was strong against Biden, I don't think he would be against Harris. As a convicted criminal running against a former prosecutor who is openly misogynistic and not so secretly racist, I think he's fundamentally weak against Harris. As long as she goes on the attack and makes no major gaffs

@towkneed Frankly, I don't think anyone can overestimate the sexism and racism among voters out there, so I think that any ticket headed by Harris is probably going to lose to Trump, just not as badly as Biden would have lost..

Agreed, any white guy from a battleground state, would be my pick. I really wish the nominee were Whitmer, rather than Harris, because she would be way better heading the ticket. But Biden and the party may have gone with Harris, simply because it was easier, smoother, and it would allow the transfer of the campaign money from Biden to her..