Agnostic.com

12 4

What level of skepticism to do use in your daily life?

James Fodor has proposed as a rule of thumb, 4 levels of skepticism for checking how well a person is processing the positions and statements around them [thegodlesstheist.com] . 0. None. You've just accepted what others have told you without examination.

  1. Genuine skeptical processing of the claims of others (people with opposing ideas).

  2. #1 + rational skeptical examination of the positions you adhere to.

  3. #2 + appropriate retention of a self-critical perspective of how you hold those positions, with a sense of scaled uncertainty for all positions.

Rhetoric 7 July 2
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

12 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I aim for 3, but realistically, am usually at 2, I think.

0
4

I gun for #3 but doubt I always reach it.

Good example is a discussion I had with my stepson this morning. My stepson's position on Trump is that he's just a more honest and undisguised version of the same perfidy that all the political elites display. According to this stand, Trump's sin is not so much what he's doing as how he's going about it ... belying our carefully-cultivated self-image as a people who love individual liberty and the rule of law, when in fact, everything Trump does has been done by all his predecessors -- only behind closed doors or in more deniable or classy ways. We've always fomented coups and assassinations and rebellions and unrest when it has suited our needs. Obama for example deported more immigrants than any of his predecessors and uncritically maintained and even expanded the drone strike program. Where was the widespread umbrage to that?

I don't know that I completely agree with my stepson but I agree to this extent -- the "this isn't who we are" / "we're better than this" rhetoric is self-congratulatory nonsense. At some point we have to acknowledge that, in fact, this IS who we are or at least who we have become. And that's sobering to realize, as well as no fun at all. Because it robs us of the self-righteousness of thinking we're better than we are as a people (and of course, by implication, better than other people).

So this has caused me to re-evaluate how I regard this political moment which is at least #2 on this scale and I hope #3.

3

I'm very skeptical when it comes to news stories from the ruling class owned media.

I'm with you and totally aware that "fake news" is both true and was also elected. The elected one is not very truthful.

May I ask which/what media outlet(s) you consider are not "ruling class owned"?

1

Healthy Skepticism is a well treasured trait to have and remember. Many people cannot defend what they think is knowledge. It may sound good but if it is was that good I'm sure it was brought up long ago. Makeup and Nice Clothes look good but have no bearing on the person wearing them.

0

Enough

2
  1. #3 + so retentive of my self critical perspective that I’m too busy scaling my uncertainty to adequately gauge the veracity of this very answer.

I know the feeling... or. at least I think I do. 😉

3

I just believe whatever Jordan Peterson tells me to believe. /s

2

Mine is cranked to 11 most of the time.

That's no joke. Spinal Tap reference or not, I demand proof, sources which is why I'm here in the first place.

1

I try for a 3, but then I 2 to make sure I'm 3-ing, which sometimes I'm not. But I can pretty consistently pull at least a 1, anyway. 0's are rare for me, but I love when I find them. It's like opening a box of candy, all the new possibilities of not having to take that thing as a given anymore! ?

Excellent perspective!

@Rhetoric Thank you. I love to learn, that's all

1

2 or 3, depending on the situation.

Gohan Level 7 July 2, 2018
2

I would say that I would rate between level 2 and 3 as a skeptic.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:121128
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.