Actually, on a similar topic, having watched many episodes of Ancient Aliens, I would be far less surprised if a UFO landed in my front yard rather than Jesus! ??

Yes, I could (and would) change my mind if evidence were irrefutable. But then, to borrow a line from something (allegedly) written into a concentration camp cell wall, "he will have to beg my forgiveness."

Given concrete verifiable evidence, I would change my opinion but don't think I have it in me to worship. I just don't care at all if a "higher power" exists or not. My general attitude has always been very close to 'okay, so?'

Only if it is Odin. I do not care for the christian guy. He was invented by truly evil people.

One of the first steps is defining "god"

If the evidence was convincing & independently verified through accepted scientific methods, I don't see why not. I think the likelihood of that ever happening is much less than say... a car in space on its way to the asteroid belt... Oh, wait...

Even if there was evidence - by now I think the standard god guy (or woman), has F'ed up so badly, they don't deserve my respect at all.

Given my total disbelief, unless they could show me live video of heaven and hell, or get me a handshake with a god like person who could control on a whim everything around them, there is zero chance of this happening. So it is kind of a non issue.

Until I'm presented with a definition of "God" that is internally consistent and not self contradictory then it is nonsensical to discuss its existence or otherwise.

Irrefutable evidence? Sure. I've changed my mind about other things when presented with objective irrefutable evidence. I cannot imagine what that objective, irrefutable evidence could be, but if it existed I would have to change my mind accordingly.

Not really. No way it could be "proven."

By the way, this website has a bit of a learning curve for dating here.

If you answer the profile questions and write your profile, listing your hobbies and interests, you'll earn website points, and members can get to know you.
Commenting on posts and writing your own earns more points. At level two you can private message people, and at level eight you get an agnostic T-shirt.

The website uses profile algorithms to find member matches, so the more details one includes, the better the match.

Many women prefer to see a written profile talking about interests, hobbies, and backgrounds that can be quickly perused to find compatible partners.

In case you didn't know yet, to find members near you, click on the "Browse" button at the top of the page, then on "Members," and enter your preferred search parameters.
Click on the "Discuss" button, then "Nearby" to find members near you also.
Or click on the "About" button at the top left of the page to find links to FAQ or the website tutorial.

Evidence would have to be irrefutable. People say that a banana fitting perfectly into a human hand is evidence or that they have found a piece of Noah's Ark or other such nonsense.

Evidence would be an entity coming out of hiding and letting itself be known, which will never happen.

If you can't take new evidence and be willing to change your opinions, then being an atheist becomes a religion itself.

None of the above.

I mean, if it could be proven, yea. This just how it is. That being said, I'd continue to not give a shit about it. Can't really see any god being active in the world. Not too mention all the horrible crap they'd also be responsible for creating. I'd remain apathetic.

If the evidence was convincing enough and could be put through some sort of test to prove its legitimacy.

I would believe in the proven god but most likely reject whatever worship was demanded. Every god I have ever learned about has been more evil than good. I would rather go to hell than worship a god who I have no respect for.

Certainly...and I would be thrilled.

What evidence would you need to believe Thor is the one true god? What evidence would this have to be?

I would be inclined to belief in a godlike entity if it revealed itself and consistently interacted with humans. However, I would definitely still be skeptical about whether the entity was actually supernatural and worthy of worship. Such things would be exceptionally difficult, if not impossible, to establish because of the sheer quantity of conceivable explanations.

Who would not change their mind if God was presented as real?

It's a Basian issue, evidence for the supernatural must be such that it shows the supernatural explanation more probable than any explanation suggested by known phenomenon

I'm always open to theories backed up by sound evidence

These questions that require me to imagine a (demented, maniacal) "deity" in order to answer the question piss me off. HUGE waste of time