Agnostic.com

6 3

QUESTION Yet Another Analysis of Amelia Earhart's Bones Unearths More Questions | Inverse

Ever since Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan disappeared in 1937, the American public has wondered where the aviators ended up. Researchers and historians haven’t had much evidence to work with, so their investigations have only raised more questions. But now, University of Tennessee Knoxville forensic anthropologist Richard Jantz, Ph.D., says he’s got the answer.

In Jantz’s new paper, published this week in the journal Forensic Anthropology, he provides evidence that human remains found on an island in the western Pacific Ocean most likely belonged to Earhart.

Jantz’s paper examines the evidence of human remains found on Nikumaroro, a small island that he and others believe to be the final resting place of Earhart and Noonan. In 1940, physician D.W. Hoodless measured seven bones found on Nikumaroro and determined they belonged to a man. Jantz disagrees.

“When Hoodless conducted his analysis, forensic osteology was not yet a well-developed discipline,” he writes in the paper.
Jantz cites a photograph of Earhart that was used to estimate the lengths of her radius and humerus bones.
Jantz cites a photograph of Earhart that was used to estimate the lengths of her radius and humerus bones.

In the decades since Earhart and Noonan’s Lockheed Electra 10E crashed over the Pacific Ocean during their attempt to circumnavigate the globe, their mysterious end has captivated the imagination, but to Jantz’s point, only recently have we developed the tools to reliably analyze the scant evidence we have. Nevertheless, every year or two, someone has claimed to have an answer, but most of these claims lack sufficient evidence. Hoodless and his early theories, suggests Jantz, are just one example.

“Evaluating his methods with reference to modern data and methods suggests that they were inadequate to his task; this is particularly the case with his sexing method,” he writes. “Therefore his sex assessment of the Nikumaroro bones cannot be assumed to be correct.”

Dougy 7 Mar 10
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Mystery may never be solved-always been an AE fan.

2

I wonder why they did not remove those bones, back in the day? Because, DNA, would surely shed some light, now. Thanks for posting that...I have kept up with previous theories.

2

With today's technology, the best they can come up with is probably?

Maybe.

5

No, just the eternal question, why do people fall for hogswaddle? This "study" was paid for by TIGHAR, the Eric von Daniken of the Amelia Earhart "mystery." A mystery in the same class as Ancient Aliens or the Bermuda Triangle mystery, IE there is no mystery. She ran out of fuel somewhere near Howland Island, no serious historian or researcher thinks otherwise.

3

I've far less curiosity over a publicity seeking daredevil than this: "Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 was en route to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur carrying 239 people on board.

They included Chinese calligraphers, a couple on their way home to their young sons after a long-delayed honeymoon and a construction worker who hadn't been home in a year.

The plane had recorded 7,525 take-offs and landings as well as 53,420 flight hours when it made its last journey.

The MH370 Boeing was seen for the last time on military radar at 2.14am, close to the south of Phuket island in the Strait of Malacca.

Before that, Malaysian authorities believe the last words heard from the plane, from either the pilot or co-pilot, was "Good night Malaysian three seven zero".

Half an hour later, the airline lost contact with the plane. It had been due to land at around 6.30am."

Varn Level 8 Mar 10, 2018

That one is a real mystery, though the plane's last actions are 100% consistent with the protocol to be followed if fire broke out on board. So likely that's what happened, but how it occured may never be known.

3

To clear up the picture, Jantz threw out Hoodless’s analysis in favor of his own method that compares Earhart’s physical dimensions to the measurements Hoodless took nearly 70 years ago.

Unfortunately, most people never get their bones measured while they’re alive, and for Earhart, the picture is even fuzzier, as her driver’s license and pilot’s license list her height differently. To get over this hurdle, Jeff Glickman of Photek used a photo of Earhart that also shows objects whose dimensions can be measured: an oil can. With estimates of Earhart’s lower arm length — including her tibia and humerus bones — Jantz was able to use U.S. military measurement data to extrapolate how long her tibia was.
Amelia Earhart crash theories plane

  1. Howland Island, where Earhart was trying to reach. 2. Jaluit Atoll, around which a documentary claims she crashed. 3. Gardner Island (Nikumaroro), where TIGHAR and Jantz claim she crashed.

Jantz took these measurements and performed two separate comparisons. First, he compared them to 2,776 other known measurements of human bones in a forensic database, and then he compared the bones from Nikumaroro to the database. “The Nikumaroro bones are at least 84 times more likely to belong to Amelia Earhart than to a random individual who ended up on the island,” he writes.

If history is any indication, other forensic anthropologists will likely challenge these findings. Jantz has advised The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, or TIGHAR, a group that previously touted the Nikumaroro hypothesis with non-peer-reviewed research. When that story came out, multiple forensic anthropologists questioned whether a photograph could ever be appropriate evidence. So as nice as it would be to put this mystery to rest, we’ll probably see similar criticisms arrive later this week.

Dougy Level 7 Mar 10, 2018

It probably is her.

I really hate to think that she starved to death.

That was an amazing century.

A child that seen some of the first cars probably lived to see the "ship" that sailed to the moon.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:35216
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.