Agnostic.com

29 4

Government Tyranny

With the gun debate so hot and heavy these days, the topic of fear of government tryanny has been tossed around a lot.

I don't trust the US government at all but I also don't see the government using guns against us. I think the government already controls the citizens of the US via money and that if total control were to happen it would come without a shot fired. I think those in power would simply make us more and more powerless by taking away our ability to feed our families and survive.

Do you think an armed conflict with your government is a real possibility? If yes, how and why?

Crimson67 8 Mar 12
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

29 comments (26 - 29)

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

With my government? No. We in the UK prefer to reserve military force for our foreign enemies.

In the USA, the entire argument is stupid. The civilian populace is armed with pseudo-assault rifles, handguns and the odd shotgun. A ruthless military is armed with some of the finest fighter jets in the world, drones, tanks, AFVs and around two million highly trained personnel. The civiliam populace would lose. Badly.

In addition, a ruthless bastard in government who actually wanted to enforce tyranny would be ousted... by the military.

And they still can't win a war....

@Buddha lol

@Buddha They don't want to. The idea is to prolong the wars. Keep them going. Keep the military build up rolling along and the flags waving. Control 101: Provide an Enemy Image

3

It has happened. There are numerous examples of the US government repressing civil liberties by force. The union movement is a perfect example.

It was done by the republicans

Hell just educate yourself on West Virginia Gato

<a href="https://aflcio.org/about/history/labor-history-people/joe-hill@twill" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="forumlink">[aflcio.org]

<a href="http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Great_Railroad_Strike_of_1877@twill" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="forumlink">[ohiohistorycentral.org]

@Gatovicolo Joan Baez sang a song about Joe Hill

@Gatovicolo I'd like to put Joe Hill's last poem to music. I wonder if anyone else has?

I doubt it, but I’d like to hear the song. @twill

I’m not surprised @twill

0

Trust me, the government have got you by the balls and they are the biggest most coordinated gang. its the same everywhere. if they want you gone then your gone. remember lady Dianna, deffinatly a hit and not an accident. with cards and morgages and all the sheeple you don't stand a fucking chance.

Oh not the gospel according to Al Fayed again ffs. Yes I have seen the documentary with all the D list celebs singing his tune. If it was all that, then why won't they show it? I will tell you why, legal reasons. In other words, he would get his arse sued off. All it proved was don`t let grieving relatives anywhere near the justice system. There was a full inquest (at tax payers expense) that dealt with this guilt trip. I say guilt trip because a, It was his pilled and drunk employee that was driving and b, If all those Diana worshipers had not bought any rag that had her pic on it then no paparazzi and no speeding car. If they were both that worried then why 85 mph in a built up area and no fucking seat belt on. Did they think they were above the law or bloody immortal?

2

I agree with you. I think that if a confrontation was to occur on a large scale that it would come mostly without a physical fight.

Mea Level 7 Mar 12, 2018
Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:35923
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.