You are entitled to your opinion obviously, but surely you cannot deny the influence they had on popular music and and those who came after them, and that perhaps your describing them as overrated maybe by way of comparison to later artist who built on what they began?

@LenHazell53 No, I'm saying that their talent was not on par with the level of praise they got. Influential and talented are not the same thing.

I made that joke once to a young catholic girl who worked in my office, she in all seriousness asked me who St.Ringo was?

George was a very talented and multifaceted musician, Ringo was a competent drummer, but both John and Paul's talents lay in their composing, Paul as a superb musical technician and John as an inspired inovator, they were never better than working together (Though I will grant you many of the cover versions of their music were better than the originals).
I will amend the above to say Paul and Denny Lane in wings sometimes equalled or bettered Lennon and McCartney (my personal favourite being Medicine Jar).

@LenHazell53 I agree..it’s their music that will live on. Individually, I don’t think any of them were particularly outstanding either as musicians or vocalists...but the collaborative composing skills of Lennon & McCartney were definitely what separated them from the other bands around at that time. Personally, I liked George Harrison best and think he was a better musician than the other three.

@altschmerz I didn’t hate them...just weren’t my favourite band. Never went to see them live, so that’s a good indicator of how you rate a band.

I was never a big fan either...although I have an appreciation of the music they wrote. Their real legacy will be in that.