Agnostic.com

2 0

Did it take you long to realize how screwed up it is to think crackers become the flesh of someone? And that we should eat these crackers with that applied to them?

Oh don't forget about wine becoming his blood. Whether it be symbolic or literal it's still pretty messed up. Not religious, no cannibalism required.

AustinSkepticus 7 Mar 31

Post a comment Reply Add Photo

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

At least the wine/grape juice has nutritional merit. Crackers not so much.

1

Wow! I thought I was a deep thinker, but I never thought that deep about, the 'crackers' being cannibalism...did think about 'wine' (grape juice), being blood. But, the whole notion could go back to ancient times, when they really did eat the dead? But, why would we need anything about food out of that ancient wisdom, in today's modern society? Most of society has enough food sources, at least in the Christian part!

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:46967
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.