Agnostic.com

36 5

In your opinion what is the most likely thing that could halt human progress?

Technology? Environment? Arrogance? Or?

atheist 8 Apr 21
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

36 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Humans!
Humans the only creatures that uses products not produce in nature by alternating them to suit their needs to change it's environment, hence destroying the ecology wholesale without any real regard for the other creatures in the ecological cycles of life on this planet t!!

0

Ignorance.

0

Racial and political division.

0

Arrogance of humans. When you are so sure you are correct in all things, you can't develop new ways of adapting. Even a virus knows how to survive. I see too many humans with no self knowledge, awareness, floating in a sea of trash. **

0

The Idiot-In-Chief and his minions. It's happening now. Not only has progress halted, it has regressed.

0

My money is on is doing it.

0
0

people, so population growth, overpopulation

0

Humanity.

0

Irrationality in all its guises

1

@atheist

I would say the thing is a conglomerate of the result of human immaturity of mind, and it breaks down into these parts:

  1. Educational stagnation

  2. Indiscriminate breeding

  3. Over-reproduction

  4. Laziness

  5. Substance abuse

  6. Stupid ideas

  7. "Okay, but we need to see what happens if we do X"

  8. Damaging the environment

  9. Attacking ecosystems

  10. Low-culture

  11. Reliance on fossil fuel

  12. Public health issues

  13. Lack of support for advancements in science, tech, etc.

  14. Lack of support for improving policy

  15. Ignoring the possibility of aliens retaliating to environmental insults from humans

  16. Most of traditional ideas

  17. Most of culture

  18. Impressionistic notions of global-scale issues like human purpose, economic plans, etc.

  19. Globalism/indiscriminate de-culturalization

  20. Reliance on bloc politics to do things & come up with ideas.

  21. Rehashing expired, poorly supported ideas

  22. Planning in the dark

  23. Giving power and rewards to idiots and/or corrupt people

  24. Serious environmental insults, like nuclear testing

@atheist

Nothing, because my purpose is already determined haha. The notion that the world can be saved is unattainable by a single person for a sheer lack of manpower.

2

The first two abused becuase of arrogance and greed.

0

Over population....

@atheist China had to do it.... India will be next... they won't have a choice at that pace

2

I agree: HUMANS

1

It depends on what is penned 'human progress'. If it means continuing on our nonsustainable path, we will doom ourselves. Arrogance?

2

Humans. That was easy... 🙂

0

A 25 kilometer diameter asteroid impact would do a right fine job.

A major solar flare could turn up the heat nicely.

A simultaneous eruption of all Earths supervolcanoes could dust us.

The arrival of an unknown virulent virus could be a culminating contagion.

I suppose just about any "take-no-prisoners-leave-no-survivors event would slow us down substantially.

@atheist -- Maybe, but then my vision is not as dark as yours, I guess.

0
  1. Breeding. animal groups that become too successful tend to breed themselves to a point beyond that in which their environment can support them.
  2. Technology - perhaps the lack of sufficent technology to prevent a meteor causing a mass extinction - or perhaps insufficent technology to expand to other planets and create more breeding space. (double edged sword, that!)

@atheist Climate change comes under the "Technology" heading. Given sufficient technology, such as a mastery of nuclear fusion, then fossil fuels become redundant and climate change fades in importance - especially since the availability of vast energy quantities would allow plentiful desalination and with it the recovery of dust bowls.

@atheist Our trouble is that we worry about what will happen after we are dead and beyond caring. Unlike the people who care more for their personal wealth than the survival of their offspring.

2

Technology is not always progress

3

I've shifted my thinking on this in the last few years while watching the rapid pace of "progress" on self-driving vehicles and self-teaching factory robots. Artificial Intelligence will leap-frog the human race and consider the 'meatbags' a nuisance before us meatbags can possibly consume our resources or sufficiently foul our nest. The labs and corporations researching and building these things are having a lot of fun doing it but it will be humanity's undoing. All it will take is ONE twisted person to delete all the safety switches. We have more than enough twisted mental patients walking around looking for a bigger gun. It won't be long... the generation being born today will see their own demise to the machines. Glad I have no kids.

I agree. I think that capitalism will continue to accelerate up until the point that man gives over control of the world to machines of the sort that Ray Kurzweil speculates about. He thinks there will be (by 2045) a technological singularity (also, simply, the singularity). The hypothesis that the invention of artificial superintelligence will abruptly trigger runaway technological growth, resulting in unfathomable changes to human civilization.

@cava That's the way I see it. I don't see a bright future for humans. I'm going to look at Kurzweil's writings.

@cava "Man" will not intentionally give over control of the world to the machines... it will be A person, or a GROUP or people who will do it, consciously, intentionally, with malice and forethought. It will be one or more suicidal terrorists, exactly as with the not-so-hypothetical terrorists of today, taking the rest of the human race with them on their way to meet the 72 virgins who are waiting for them in their reward. Just one twisted (or incompetent) A.I. nerd is all it will take to unleash the machines. Once the machines can design & build their own, advancements by them and for their own purposes will take place overnight while we sleep.

0

Nothing. Progress can be impeded, but not stopped.
Given our short life span we have a skewed vision of evolution.
But think of where humanity was even 200 years ago. That's roughly three life times.
Still sucks in a lot of ways, but obviously many things have improved despite the impediments of some.

2

I have always thought about resource depletion trumping technology.

I'm waiting for that issue to be resolved, tbh. Has me a bit shook up about the quality of life when SHTF.

0

Some naztural catastrophe -- asteroid strike, super-volcano eruption, global warming, ice age, etc.

3

Fundamentalists—and I say this not to be hyperbolic. Right now, we as a species are facing down mass extinction, but because of fundamentalists we’re not able to address it.

2

Continued ignorance of basic science.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:62931
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.