Step by step, we follow truth. If we're wrong, we change the way. It is not shameful to change own thought, when necessary, as Seneca said. It is foolish not to.

When I think about mythology, I think about imaginary creatures like a genie flying around on carpet, a dragon spitting fire, or witches flying around on brooms. These figures are all derived combing visible elements of earth and are generally accepted by the population without much hate.

But as it seems, even when there aren't very many imaginary creatures in the Bible, there still remains much hate on the subject. Possibly because Christians believe without doubting (which I believe this lack of doubt to be a lie for most) that a Bush caught on fire and didn't burn out or Jesus made a blind man see using mud and his hands. Even still, I would not consider such events as "mythological." There is meaning which can be found in the stories even if they are not taken literally.

Angels might be considered more closely related to mythological creatures. But even still, they are not on the physical plane and are considered some kind of metaphysical energy.

The serpent and the weird figures appearing in revelations are the only places I can see calling a character in the Bible as a mythological creature. I am sure I am missing a few. But even still the anti Bible population engages in much more myth traditionally than the Christian Church.

And God said to Moses, I have something for you, What's that said Moses, commandments God replied, how much do they cost asked Moses, they are free said God..............perfect, I'll take ten!

And misogynistically as well.

Speaking of biblical misunderstandings….

When the good lord was giving out looks your mother thought he said “books” and she asked for a scary one.

When the good lord was giving out brains your mother thought he yelled “trains” and got you out of the way.

That’s all I got.