I can say that when it comes to software development, it's actually a challenge to come up with something decent because it requires a lot of skills and knowledge, so it's not surprising that some errors may appear. It was one of the reasons I decided to turn to low-code, and tools like [processmix.com] actually help me with all my business processes, reducing the errors due to human factor.

In my opinion it is organized religion that tries to force a "One path fits all." dogma that makes people conclude there is no divine creator but I think that is ignorant too. Think of all we as humans have accomplished in the way of cloning, space travel, technology and then it becomes apparent this is not random. Personally I picture a mad scientist like Einstein or Christoper Lloyd in Back To The Future. I just do not believe in religion. A creator that makes us infinitely unique but expects us all to follow the same path to knowledge does not make any sense but a creator that just keeps designing new things makes perfect sense.

Whoever said that there can't be some inherent survival intelligence in nature that results in design, or at least what we perceive as design? The problem with Intelligent Design theory is the fundamental assumption that even the appearance of intelligence or design can't be explained without postulating some sort of "God" or "gods". Whoever said that the existential basis of the Universe, without postulating some incomprehensible entity called a "god", is pure chaotic idiocy? Nature begs to differ.

Intelligent design presupposes a god so it is at odds with rational thought.

Simulation theory perhaps needs an architect, a designer, and a software development team but they aren't necessarily gods either. Just another level of abstraction.

If there is a god, then s/he is 8 years old and we're an ant farm.

I might be wrong so I'll go ask my unicorn too @JosephMullaney

I would suggest a book by Dr Leonard Susskin, a theoretical physicist. Cosmic Landscape: String Theory & the Illusion of Intelligent Design.

Here is just a short talk from Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson on stupid design:

Intelligent design resides in the “god of the gaps” dilemma. As science progresses, the gaps that need god to explain them grow smaller. Someday there will be no need for a god explanation as the answers to these questions will have a logical explanation.

You know the theory that we are living in a computer simulation? If true, then there's an intelligent designer. [scientificamerican.com]

The problem I see with intelligent design is this: it assumes a watch needs a watchmaker; but the watchmaker (more complex than the watch, for sure) came from nothing. How does that make sense at all?

Intelligent design is defined by "the theory that life, or the universe, cannot have arisen by chance and was designed and created by some intelligent entity." Who designed the intelligent entity? It's a recursive process of designer to designer to designer to designer to designer to designer to designer.. ad infinitum. Which designer in that continuum is more intelligent? LoL

I agree with Lloyd Pye's book, "Intervention Theory of Origins—
of the Universe, of Life, of Hominoids, and of Humans."

Hell yes, but let me ask my unicorn for a second opinion.

I would venture to say yes, but im no expert. Then you have to think if a creator is needed for something to exist, who created the creator and who created that creator....its a never ending cycle...