I admit I find the idea interesting.
Free will: now there's an old, old debate topic. There is something to what he says. What we think, say, and do is obviously shaped by our culture, environment, experience, and neural wiring. Any yet I cannot help but think that I have choices, that I make executive decisions that may cut across all those other factors. Is my sense of freedom, limited though it may be, just an illusion? I don't think so.
I've Always said that we are slaves to our own nature. A nature that has evolved over the course of our lives.
Your sense of freedom is an illusion. You are not ultimately free yet that's the eternal goal of our species. To know that feeling. I'm very privileged to be experiencing a great deal of it and freedom is heady. Still, I write the wrong word and it's right off to Z's Prison so ultimate freedom still escapes me. As for free will, that may be a thing for our neural networks but our decisions come from it's interpretation of sensory data. Incomplete data, at that, but what choice you make works well enough for this illusion. I don't mean to single you out, specifically, as it's a pretty common thing.
I’ve read his book on this subject. Sam’s not the first by any means to make the case against free will. I still find the concept most challenging to accept.
I can see both sides to it.