Agnostic.com

8 15

LINK Federal Officials Charge Four Officers in Breonna Taylor Raid

Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs - 4h ago

Federal officials on Thursday charged four current and former police officers in Louisville, Ky., who were involved in a fatal raid on the apartment of Breonna Taylor, accusing them of several crimes, including lying to obtain a warrant that was used to search her home.

During the nighttime raid in March 2020, officers knocked down the door and fired a volley of gunshots after Ms. Taylor’s boyfriend shot an officer in the leg, believing that intruders had burst into the home. Two officers shot Ms. Taylor, a 26-year-old emergency room technician, who was pronounced dead at the scene.

Attorney General Merrick Garland said at a news conference that the Louisville officers had “violated federal civil rights laws, and that those violations resulted in Ms. Taylor’s death.”

Sign up for The Morning newsletter from The New York Times

The killing of Ms. Taylor, who was Black, helped to set off protests in the spring and summer of 2020 following the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, and led to intense scrutiny of the Police Department in Louisville.

The Justice Department has been investigating the department and the county government for more than a year, reviewing whether officers regularly use unreasonable force and whether officers who break the department’s rules are held accountable.

Neither of the officers who shot and killed Ms. Taylor have ever been charged, nor are they named in the new indictments.

The charges instead name three officers who were part of an investigative unit that obtained the search warrant for the raid, along with a fourth officer who was later fired from the department because, officials said, he had fired blindly into Ms. Taylor’s apartment and struck a neighboring apartment.

That former officer, Brett Hankison, already faced state criminal charges in the case — the only charges filed over the raid until Thursday — but was acquitted. The new indictment accuses him of federal civil rights violations.

The bulk of the charges in the latest indictment surround the search warrant that police officers had sought in an investigation of Ms. Taylor’s former boyfriend, whom they had believed to be selling drugs.

Prosecutors said on Thursday that two detectives and a police sergeant had falsely claimed in an affidavit used to obtain the warrant that the former boyfriend had been receiving packages at Ms. Taylor’s apartment. In fact, according to the indictment, the officers had no evidence of such packages, but misrepresented their case to the judge who authorized the raid.

One of the officers charged, Joshua Jaynes, a former detective who was also fired over his role in the raid, sent a draft of the affidavit to Kelly Goodlett, another detective now facing charges, in which he included the false claim about the packages, the prosecutors said.

Ms. Goodlett knew that the claim was false, the prosecutors said, but did not object to it, and also added what they described as a “misleading” claim that the former boyfriend was using the address to Ms. Taylor’s apartment as his current address.

The third officer charged, Sgt. Kyle Meany, who led a department investigative unit, approved the affidavit despite knowing that it contained the false information, according to the indictment.

The indictment accuses two of the officers not only of including false information in the affidavit, but conspiring to lie about it afterward. Two months after Ms. Taylor’s death, prosecutors said, Mr. Jaynes and Ms. Goodlett met in Mr. Jaynes’s garage and decided to tell investigators, falsely, that a sergeant had informed them that packages were being sent to Ms. Taylor’s apartment.

Mr. Jaynes and Mr. Meany were each accused of violating Ms. Taylor’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Ms. Goodlett was accused of conspiring to falsify the affidavit, as well as conspiring to hinder the subsequent investigation into the raid. Mr. Jaynes was also charged with conspiring to hinder the investigation.

Mr. Hankison was accused of depriving Ms. Taylor, her boyfriend and their neighbors of their rights by unreasonably firing 10 bullets through a window and sliding glass door that were covered with blinds.

HippieChick58 9 Aug 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

So the warrant was issued under false pretenses. Then they lied to cover up their initial lie to get the warrant after murdering an innocent woman in her bed. Sounds like a case that should lead to some real jail time. If justice prevails when it is all over.

4

I'm glad that some justice may be done, and hope that it leads to the eradication of police abusing the system (although it's just a baby step), but it's still a travesty that practices like no-knock warrants exist.

5

Just horrible coniracy!!!!!!
I liked reading all of the fruits of what appears to be a very thorough investigation! TFP!

6

About fucking time..

Exactly

4

Bought time

6

I'm delighted that this investigation was carried forward and Justice may still be done.

8

All law enforcement officers MUST be made to understand that they and their tactics are not above the law.

"Fuck the Law. We are here to ensure that all niggers, wogs, coons, foreigners and other misfits are kept in their proper place: six feet under. Oh, and the abolition of slavery was a huge mistake, as was the emancipation of women."

(Sorry, but there are times when I feel that the above is the only way to confront such wretches and bastards with their own evil.)

9

I hadn't heard that little detail, they they lied to get the search warrant and lied to conceal their lie. Hope they spend a long time in prison.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:679811
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.