6 12

This was a satisfying bit of news.

Maddow Blog | Foolish anti-Clinton case leads to steep penalty for Trump, lawyers
Story by Steve Benen

The judiciary is not a toy. It is not something politicians are supposed to play with for their amusement. When politicians and their lawyers forget these plain truths, they should pay a price — not just as a penalty, but also in order to discourage others from making the same mistake.

With this in mind, it was satisfying to see this NBC News report overnight.

In case anyone needs a refresher as to how we arrived at this point — keeping track of Team Trump’s legal troubles is admittedly challenging — let’s circle back to our recent coverage of this case.

It was in March 2022 when Trump had the bright idea of suing Clinton and several other Democrats, alleging they tried to rig the 2016 presidential election by bringing attention to his Russia scandal. The case, believe it or not, alleged “racketeering” and a “conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood,” among other things.

By any fair measure, the lawsuit was utterly bonkers, though it had a serious goal: Trump claimed the Russia scandal cost him more than $24 million — and he wanted his legal targets to pay far more than that.

The judge in the case didn’t just reject the underlying claims, Middlebrooks could barely contain his disgust with the inanity of the legal complaint.

“These were political grievances masquerading as legal claims,” Middlebrooks concluded. “This cannot be attributed to incompetent lawyering. It was a deliberate use of the judicial system to pursue a political agenda.” He went on to cite the attorneys’ “cavalier attitude towards facts.”

At the time, the jurist imposed sanctioned the Republican’s attorneys, directing them to pay a $50,000 penalty for advancing a “frivolous” lawsuit. As The New York Times’ report explained, a number of the former president’s targets soon after filed a joint motion, seeking additional sanctions.

Yesterday, the judge agreed.

“This case should never have been brought. Its inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start. No reasonable lawyer would have filed it,” Middlebrooks wrote, adding that the suit was intended “for a political purpose.”

What’s more, as NBC News’ report noted, the judge took care to explain why Trump, and not just his attorneys, bore responsibility.

“Mr. Trump is a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries. He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process, and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer. He knew full well the impact of his actions,” Middlebrooks wrote. “As such, I find that sanctions should be imposed upon Mr. Trump and his lead counsel, Ms. Habba.”

Making matters just a bit worse for the former president’s team, the judge also said the actions taken by Trump’s lawyers were so egregious that they might very well lead to attention from “the bar and disciplinary authorities.”

It remains to be seen whether this will deter the Republican and his lawyers from filing other dumb lawsuits — Trump's absurd case against the Pulitzer Prize Board keeps coming to mind — but a $937,989 bill is likely to be memorable.

This article was originally published on

silverotter11 9 Jan 20

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account


Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.


A million bucks for Trump is just a normal business expense, no more annoying than a mosquito bite and will not deter him from using law suites as threats to his perceived enemies. Which is pretty much anyone not MAGA cult members.

His money stream and usefulness is waning, imo, we'll just have to wait and see. trump did just withdraw a lawsuit against NY attorney James.


Now we can plainly see what the party of law and order has to face when others take their claim literally. Hopefully, this is just the beginning. We all know the POS and his enablers will try to appeal and indictment and then re-appeal to eventually wear the justice system out. Nip it in the bud (with a big, Great White Shark bite).


Splendid. It might also remind us that SP Smith may be waiting for other such legal "issues" to get cleared before he charges 45 with something and gives him another delay excuse on these minor things. Maybe. I hope.


It is a start. If Trump's lawyers start feeling nervous then they will be increasingly reluctant to 'bend the truth' on his behalf.

Maybe if a few get disbarred others will think twice.


Right. Frivolous lawsuits are a waste of the court's time and Trump's lawyers continue to look ridiculous. No respectable lawyer takes bad instructions from a client. Any client.


Life's a BITCH ... Now if we can just put him behind BARS.

.... and not the ones serving cocktails....!

@Petter Maybe a different kind of cock tail.

@JackPedigo he doesn't drink alcohol...

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:705731
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.