Agnostic.com

4 7

LINK Arizona school board member sues district prohibiting her from reading Bible scripture during meetings -- NBC News

Heather Rooks read scripture at meetings for the Peoria Unified School District Governing Board to prepare herself for her duties, her attorneys said.

An Arizona school board member said she is no longer allowed to read from the Bible during board meetings after she was told it is illegal to do so, according to a federal lawsuit she filed.

Heather Rooks read one scripture at every meeting for the Peoria Unified School District Governing Board to prepare herself for her duties, her attorneys said in a press release.

But in July, she felt "compelled to stop" after the board sent her a letter stating that reciting the verses violated the Establishment Clause, which "prohibits the government from establishing a religion."

She's now suing the Peoria Unified School District, alleging that quoting from any text during a public meeting is protected free speech.

"Heather takes her responsibilities serving the parents and students in her community seriously, and quotes Bible verses as a source of courage and strength in performing those duties," attorney Andy Gould with First Liberty Institute said in a statement. "Like so many dedicated public leaders throughout our history, Heather most certainly can use inspirational quotes from religious, historical, and philosophical sources and figures as a source of personal inspiration as well and encouragement to the community at-large."

Rooks would recite the verses during a "Board comments" portion of the meetings, which allowed board members to make remarks or discuss topics that were not on the agenda, according to the lawsuit.

"At the beginning of her comments, Rooks would often recite a brief Bible verse—a simple quotation without elaboration or further comment," the lawsuit states. "Each time Rooks recited a scripture, she chose the verse to solemnize the occasion and fortify herself to perform her official duties."

During her first board meeting on Jan. 12, she recited Joshua 1:9, thanked her supporters and "promised to stand firm in her service to the community," the suit reads.

For months after that, she continued to read from the Bible at meetings.

The suit says that Rooks never asked or prompted anyone else to acknowledge the scriptures. After reciting them, she would thank teachers and parents, acknowledge any upcoming holidays or bring attention to any issues affecting the district, according to the lawsuit.

Following a Feb. 9 meeting, the legal director for Secular AZ, a nonprofit group "that protects the constitutional separation of church and state," allegedly submitted a complaint to the board that Rooks' recitation of the Bible was "unconstitutional proselytizing."

In response to the complaint, the board's legal counsel told board members in an email that they couldn't pray or recite scripture during meetings, the lawsuit says.

At a March 9 meeting, Rooks started to recite 1 Corinthians 16:13 prompting the board president to interrupt her "to tell her that 'reciting scripture at a board meeting on this side of the dais goes against the Establishment Clause,'" according to the lawsuit.

As Rooks continued to read the scriptures, more alleged complaints were made against her. In May, the Freedom From Religion Foundation told the board it needed to "take whatever action necessary to ensure that Ms. Rooks and all other members of the Board respect the constitutional rights of the Peoria Unified School District community."

The group, which works as an "umbrella for those who are free from religion," said that if the board didn't take action it could face "unnecessary liability and potential financial strain."

Rooks ultimately decided to stop reciting Bible verses due to "months of sustained external pressure from outside activist groups and internal pressure from the Board itself," the suit says.

The school district did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. Secular AZ's executive director said in a statement on Sept. 29 that Rooks' lawsuit was another "long string of bullying behaviors aimed at intimidation of the Board, a usurpation of legitimate authority, and an enforcement of Christian nationalists’ dogma."

"As a private individual, Rooks is free to practice as she sees fit. As a school board member, she must follow the law," executive director Jeanne Casteen said.

Rooks said in a statement via her attorneys that she believed "quoting scripture out loud to be encouraging to myself and to many in attendance."

snytiger6 9 Oct 6
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

I hope she loses and is counter-sued. Her right to her religion doesn't supersede everyone else's right to be free from her religion.

5

Rooks is perfectly free to recite all the bible verses she wants on the street, but inside a government proceeding, she is seeking to violate the 1st Amendment. That 1st Amendment protects everyone else from not being forcibly indoctrinated by kooks like her. These fanatics CHOOSE not to honor the spirit of the Constitution nor the country in honoring diversity of thought. She is violating her oath of office and thus unfit for her position.

Christian supremacists never learn.

It's a case of the separation clause vs. the free exercise clause. Where exactly do we draw the line? If I were on that board and arguing a point on X topic, I might use a phrase from the Bible or from Shakespeare to drive home my point. And I doubt that anybody would object to that. However. Just reading a passage from the Bible, not linked to any point I was making would, in my opinion, represent a lame attempt at proselytization. Either way, it's not exactly cut-and-dried. I would like to hear more argument before issuing my ruling. 😂

6

And what about readings from the Torah, the Quran and the Pastafarium?

And dimwits like her sit on school governing bodies? No wonder education in the U$A is descending into Bible-induced ignorance!

There’s no hope at this point.

3

It will he interesting to see how this case is adjudicated. I'm guessing that prohibiting the Board member from reciting a Bible verse is a violation of her 1st Amendment rights to free speech and free expression of religion.

I see @racocn8's comment as being pertinent here.

@anglophone Did you see my reply to his comment?

@Flyingsaucesir I did. I await developments.

Well on the one had there is free speech and freedom of religion, and on the other hand there is the fact that she creates a public disturbance that disrupts proceedings of a government body and the founding fathers purposefully made government secular, precisely to be able to get things accomplished.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:733109
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.