Agnostic.com

5 9

LINK Trump shooting: Thomas Crooks' plan and the botched security

Graeme Baker
BBC News, Washington

Thomas Matthew Crooks walked into Donald Trump's election rally in Pennsylvania, unopposed with a gun, explosives and a rangefinder to measure distance to his target.
The aftermath of the 13 July shooting reveals a detailed plan hatched in the days before - and a series of security failings that allowed its execution.

Three congressional hearings were held this week with the head of the FBI, the Secret Service's director and Pennsylvania's state police chief.

Here is what those hearings have added to what is known about the attempt on Trump's life, what went wrong, and important unanswered questions.

The preparation

It is becoming clear that Crooks' attack was not the result of a last-minute meltdown: He had method, and purpose.

The FBI has said that 6 July appeared to be the inception date: Crooks registered to attend Trump's rally, and researched the assassination of President John F Kennedy, googling: "How far away was Oswald from Kennedy?"

"That's a search that's obviously significant in terms of his state of mind," Christopher Wray, the FBI's director, told the House Judiciary committee on Wednesday. He added that searches by Crooks then became "focused" on Trump.

He was working alone - the FBI say they do not think he received any help.
There was also reconnaissance. Mr Wray said Crooks was flying a drone about 200 yards (183m) from the stage two hours before Trump's rally.

Its camera ran for about 11 minutes, Mr Wray said, and the footage would have shown "a rear-view mirror of the scene" behind Crooks' eventual firing position.
What we know about the Trump attacker

Mr Wray said that Crooks had bought an AR-15-style rifle from his father, legally, although he did not say when. The gun had a collapsible stock, making it easier to conceal.
State police officers reported him using a rangefinder, a marksman's aid that measures distance to a target, as the rally got under way.

Crooks had also obtained explosives: two "crude" devices fitted with receivers were found in Crooks' car after the attack, Mr Wray said, and a transmitter was found on his body.
A bloodied receipt was also found on Crooks for a 5ft ladder, Mr Wray said - suggesting a recent buy. No ladder was found at the site, however, and Mr Wray said Crooks had used "mechanical equipment" to get to his perch - but did not elaborate.

And so Crooks turned up on the day with a concealable rifle, knowledge of previous assassinations, a rangefinder, two bombs, and detailed information on the layout of the area.

An aerial view of the Butler venue showing the location of the sniper teams, Trump's stage and where the gunman's body was

A plan in action

It should be impossible for a man to walk into a presidential rally with so much gear, let alone carry it up to an undefended roof with a direct line of sight to the stage. But this is exactly what happened in Butler.

Statements to the House Homeland Security committee by Pennsylvania's police commissioner, Christopher Paris, convey a series of lapses from law enforcement.
The venue had two layers of security - an outer area patrolled by state police and an inner perimeter manned by Secret Service agents, including an anti-sniper team on a roof behind the stage.

An operations centre was staffed by members of the various agencies present. But on the day, communication was haphazard and areas of responsibility unclear.

Mr Paris told his hearing that state police were responsible for the area around the AGR International warehouse, the building from which Crooks fired that was around 400ft (122m) from the stage with a clear line of sight.

He revealed his men had raised its risk in the days before the rally and were told by the Secret Service that it was a state police matter as it was in the outer area.

As a consequence, a local SWAT-style Emergency Services Unit (ESU) team was stationed inside the building complex, Mr Paris added.

The New York Times reported that the team was in fact two men who stayed inside because of the hot weather. The plan had been approved by the Secret Service, the newspaper's source said.

Kimberly Cheatle, director of the Secret Service until she stepped down this week, told lawmakers she could not account for why no one was stationed on the roof.

What went wrong?

Mr Paris said the first sighting of Crooks came from a state police ESU unit.

Unlike others in the crowd, Crooks was walking around and did not try to enter the venue, he said. "Crooks never made it through the secure perimeter."

He was not challenged. Mr Paris said he was one of three people flagged as "suspicious" at this point in the event.

About 25 minutes before the rally began, however, Mr Paris said that the ESU team spotted him again - this time using his rangefinder, though no gun was reported.
This is perhaps the point where security broke down irrevocably.

A photograph of Crooks was sent by a member of the ESU team to a state trooper in the joint operations room. Mr Paris said that a Secret Service liaison asked the trooper to send the photo to another number.

At this point, it seems that agents charged with protecting Trump did not consider Crooks dangerous enough to act - no weapon had been spotted.

During her fractious hearing before the House Oversight committee on Monday, Ms Cheatle acknowledged her agents were told about Crooks at least twice before the shooting began.

She said that agents only became aware of the gravity of the threat "seconds before the gunfire started".

The crucial moments

Mr Paris said several local police, including the ESU team, then began searching for Crooks. It appears he was lost again, despite his growing threat.

Witnesses told the BBC that by this point they had seen a man with a gun crawling along a roof. All of this was happening with Trump already on stage.

Mr Paris said that Crooks was eventually seen on the roof by local traffic police and his ESU team. One traffic officer boosted up to the roof by a colleague was forced to fall back after being confronted by Crooks, Mr Paris told the hearing.

That confrontation, the commissioner said, happened "a matter of seconds" before the shooting.

Agents surrounded Trump immediately after the first shots, and he was off the stage within two minutes. By this point Crooks had been shot dead by a sniper.

A video recorded on the roof about an hour after the attack shows snipers and Secret Service agents trying to understand who saw what and when, adding to the sense of confusion among law enforcement.

Eight bullet casings were found near his body. He had killed one crowd member and injured two others.

Amid speculation over whether Trump was actually hit by a bullet, the FBI confirmed two weeks afterwards that the Republican was indeed wounded by a round from the suspect's weapon.

The agency said in a statement: "What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle."

Why was Trump allowed on stage?

Trump was on stage for around 10 minutes between the moment Crooks was spotted on the roof with a gun and the moment he fired his first shot.

There is almost no public account of the Secret Service's actions and decisions during the rally. Ms Cheatle declined to answer most of the questions put to her in Congress - down to how many agents were protecting Trump.

We do know, via Ms Cheatle, that agents dismissed the alerts about him because he was not seen with a weapon.

She could not provide her hearing a detailed timeline, as requested, saying she "did not have specifics".

She quit as director of the Secret Service a day after her hearing, under pressure from both sides of the House, and it seems we won't get answers any time soon.
What was Crooks' motive?

More than a week on, we still do not know of any specific ideology or belief that drove Crooks to do what he did.

Mr Wray of the FBI told his hearing that a motive was one of the "central questions" of his bureau's investigations.

However, he said that interviews with Crooks' associates and searches of his home and online history did not give a "clear picture".

Analysis of the gunman's phone showed that he had "done a lot of searches" for news articles - but there was no pattern, Mr Wray added.

Investigators were still decrypting messages on the phone, he said.
We know he donated $15 to a Democratic Party platform shortly after the Capitol riot of 2021, then months later registered as a Republican.

No "manifesto" has been found.

What he planned to do with his explosives, meanwhile, remains unclear - Mr Wray said that while his bombs were viable, their receivers were off and Crooks would not have been able to detonate them remotely.

HippieChick58 9 July 28
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

While the SS failures are interesting (I wonder if their lax behavior is because the traitor isn't the candidate one presumes would be shot?), what's scary is how much destruction can be wrought by a kid who couldn't even qualify for his school's gun clubs (he failed their entry test). It makes me worry about what even his sluggish followers could accomplish with how well armed they are.

Lauren Level 8 July 30, 2024
3

I could of spent my time watching the hearings but I just can't. There were some failures but being as the rally was in a pretty GOP/red area maybe there just wasn't the level of concern one would expect. Besides, everyone has a fucking gun these days, carry concealed is LEGAL in PA and school kids, places of worship and grocery stores seem to be the favorite targets for the white male nutters so I can sort of see the bit of slacking off here on protection. THAT was said more tongue in cheek than seriously.
I think we can all be somewhat glad he did not kill trump. The right is losing what little there is of their collective minds and he was only nicked . . . on the ear, for fuck sake.
Fortunately we have a new candidate, a 'couch', cat ladies and the Olympics to distract the media from 24/7 coverage of trump.

5

The big question, for me, was with so much going for the shooter how did he miss? In a big report in the Seattle TImes, about the failing secret service agency, in which the director has stepped down, it was stated the problems have gotten too large for this agency to handle. Duh, with the conservatives hell bent on allowing as many guns as possible to be legalized what should one expect. If we can't even protect elementary schools how can we protect a president especially one as odorous as tRump. What he has helped sow so should he receive.

6

"The agency (FBI) said in a statement: "What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle."

Oh yeah? What would be the forensic basis for making that statement? Did said bullet also leave the two cuts on Trump's face? As long as Christopher Wray heads the FBI, the FBI has zero credibility, especially in regards to such matters. Wray facilitated Trump's attack on the Capitol and the smell of that can never improve.

The government does itself no favors by issuing statements like this that have no backing.
How did Crooks get three off-shore encrypted bank accounts? The government has to PROVE this wasn't another one of Trump/Stones stunts and their doing a shitty job of it.

I had thought of that and, obviously, did others. It would then make him a living martyr.

5

HC...there's a LOT we've yet to learn about this, isn't there?

Hopefully, a lot more attention must be given to Kamala! Especially given all the MAGA, right wing nuts roaming large.

@pedigojr She'll have Secret Service.....hopefully, more COMPETENT agents! And hopefully, she'll hold her appearances indoors.

@pamagain Having been a former prosecuting attorney and VP for two jobs I'm sure she's well aware of the danger. She has gained tremendous traction in just the first week and things will only go up for her and down for the Republicans. They will become desperate and we should not be surprised at the extremes they will do to get her out of the picture. She has become a breath of fresh air and hope. It's been shown she has already passed Biden's popularity.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:762469
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.