Agnostic.com

2 7

LINK Google and Apple Face Billions in Penalties After Losing E.U. Appeals

Excellent news.

The Europeans showing the way.

The US Justice Dept is also taking action against these companies. So long as Harris wins it will proceed.


Google and Apple Face Billions in Penalties After Losing E.U. Appeals

By Adam Satariano
Reporting from London

Sept. 10, 2024
Updated 4:54 a.m. ET
The European Union’s highest court on Tuesday delivered a major victory in the bloc’s yearslong campaign to regulate the technology industry, ruling against Apple and Google in two landmark legal cases.

The decisions, issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union, were seen as an important test of efforts in Europe to clamp down on the world’s largest technology companies. Apple and Google have been frequent targets for E.U. regulators, and the companies have battled the cases for years.

In the Apple case, the court sided with a European Union order from 2016 for Ireland to collect 13 billion euros, worth about $14.4 billion today, in unpaid taxes from the company. Regulators determined that Apple had struck illegal deals with the Irish government that allowed the company to pay virtually nothing in taxes on its European business in some years.

Apple won an earlier decision to strike down the order, a ruling that the European Commission, the E.U.’s executive branch, appealed to the Court of Justice. As the case winded its way through the appeals process, the €13 billion was placed in an escrow account until a final judgment. The money will now be released to Ireland, a sizable injection to the country’s treasury.

Apple said the decision effectively allowed the European Union to impose a double tax on company income that is already taxed in the United States.

“This case has never been about how much tax we pay, but which government we are required to pay it to,” Apple said in a statement on Tuesday. “The European Commission is trying to retroactively change the rules and ignore that, as required by international tax law, our income was already subject to taxes in the U.S.”

In the Google case, the court agreed with the commission’s 2017 decision to fine the company €2.4 billion for giving preferential treatment to its own price-comparison shopping service over rival offerings. Google lost an appeal in 2021.

Google said Tuesday in a statement that it was “disappointed” by the ruling, but that it had already adjusted its products to comply with the 2017 decision, including new designs to steer consumers to rival shopping price comparison websites. Some competitors have complained Google’s changes have not gone far enough.

“Our approach has worked successfully for more than seven years, generating billions of clicks for more than 800 comparison shopping services,” Google said in the statement.

When the European Union penalized Apple and Google, the cases represented a major shift in how the tech industry was regulated. Until then, governments around the world had largely taken a hands-off approach to tech oversight as Apple, Google, Amazon and Facebook — now renamed Meta — ballooned in size and remade how people live, work, shop and communicate.

The cases helped establish the European Union and its antitrust chief, Margrethe Vestager, as the world’s most aggressive tech industry watchdog. Other countries have followed Europe’s lead to intensify scrutiny of the sector’s business practices, particularly in the United States.

Yet years later, the cases have also come to symbolize the grinding pace of the E.U. regulatory system and have raised broader questions about whether authorities can keep up with the rapidly evolving tech sector.

The two cases address different legal issues. The Google case is largely about antitrust law, while the Apple case centers on the European Union’s ability to intervene in areas of tax policy in one of its member nations.

Apple and Google are facing legal scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic. This week, Google landed in U.S. federal court on antitrust charges brought by the Justice Department, which accused the company of abusing its dominance in the digital advertising sector. Last month, a federal judge ruled in a separate case that Google was a monopolist in internet search because it had rigged the search engine market. In December, a federal jury said Google’s management of the Google Play app store had also broken antitrust laws.

Apple also faces a Justice Department antitrust lawsuit over its iPhone policies.

In Europe, Google is appealing two other antitrust cases in addition to the shopping case. In 2018, regulators fined Google €4.34 billion for breaking antitrust laws to bolster its Android operating system. In 2019, the company was fined €1.49 billion for unfair business practices in the digital advertising market.

Apple is also facing E.U. charges related to its management of the app store and policies in the music streaming market.

The European Union’s protracted appeals process has drawn criticism from consumer rights groups and rival businesses that argue the slow pace has helped the two technology giants to solidify their dominant market positions.

The European Union is trying to speed up its handling of competition cases. In 2022, the bloc passed a law called the Digital Markets Act, which gives regulators broader authority to fine large tech platforms and force them to change business practices

David1955 8 Sep 10
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

I wonder if, horror of all horrors tRump wins and the 2025 plan starts to take affect, one item says government regulations will cease how this will affect international trade. It will make this country a pariah among developed nations. This item among many are clear evidence the greed and unmitigated stupidity of some corporations and their leaders have no bounds.

3

I do believe that Google has monopolized search and search procedures within their platform. I can hardly use them with any accuracy today at all, and I resent that. Seems they are being paid to put certain results up front before you actually see what you have searched for. As for the Apple lawsuit, I think it is another thing here entirely.

Whatever happened to the concept of competition being a prime driver of the economy? Seems the more money one has the more one is able to circumvent the rules. I recently read that many Tesla or would-be Tesla owners are either giving up their cars of not buying them. A lot is due to the extremism of Musk but a lot is because other manufacturers have come out with electric cars that are either better and/or cheaper. I personally find them ugly most especially the horrible looking truck.

@pedigojr when did " the concept of competition being a prime driver of the economy" ever drive capitalism, certainly at the corporate level? Maybe in Adam Smith's books, centuries ago. A lot of 'competition' is nothing more than faux competition, except maybe in specific areas.

@David1955 Competition is needed for a real company to gain public trust. The bean counter and monopolistic idea has been around and even take over but some presidents, T. Roosevelt have fought against this idea. Most true business people understand what monopolies do to a nations economy and its citizens.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:766438
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.