Agnostic.com

17 9

The scientific method helps us understand ourselves and the world around us better than any other method.

When discussing reality, do you prefer a more direct, literal delivery that includes logic, science and facts, or a more nuanced warm, romantic, esoteric delivery?

Which do you prefer and why?

*see attached cartoon for extreme examples. Lol

By AMGT8
Actions Follow Post Like

Post a comment Add Source Add Photo

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

17 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I have liked a variety of deliveries and styles of presentstion of scientific information but generally I prefer a direct approach.

However, nuances, humor, intimacy and other things have real impacts on receptivity, too.

0

Well put in the cartoon... I would prefer the warm approach. If i could have a 50 - 50 of each ...that would be nice. If i had to be all science all the time I might not feel love for others, if that makes sense. I would love to use the warm approach on children. Instead of explaining that this picture is only here to have you understand truth and charley Brown is nothing more then a poor drawing of a boy and a dog. That could be a dry sense of humor. I had that in me at one time. It's hard to get rid of it.

0

When it comes to reality, direct and literal. Everything else should be fun.

1

"We're made of star stuff." ~ Carl Sagan.

Be poetic. Be literal. Sometimes it's the same. I appreciate the power of metaphor and talk about how my mom's friend Phyllis lives on because I hand out carrot cake. Her impact, her ripples, live on and what are we to others, but the ripples we cause? I am being literal and romantic at the same time. That is the "immortality" I chase, so sometimes you need to just let the romantic words roll on.

DJVJ311 Level 7 Dec 18, 2017

You give carrot cake to your mom's friend so you can see her nipples?

Am I missing something?

0

You can be romantic and nuanced with facts. Like how the light coming from those stars took possibly millions or billions of years to reach you. The fact you are looking deeper into the past than human minds can truly comprehend. The fact that we are made up of the ancient remnant of one of those beautiful little lights. How we are all continuations of an almost endless ever changing chemical reaction. There is a simple wonder in the mere fact of our existence that no one should throw away.

0

Direct ,scientific,logic, and facts. I want an analytic break down so I can easier make sense of it. Romantic ,or nuace, or sugar coat? I don't want a fairytale, lol

0

Just the facts ma'am nothing but the facts.

noworry28 Level 7 Dec 17, 2017
2

I prefer the facts; and, even if they are cold and hard, it does not mean that beauty cannot be appreciated and experienced on an emotional level. Knowing what stars are makes them more fascinating, not less.

Joanne Level 6 Dec 17, 2017

Absolutely. Well said.

@Joanne your comment reminded me of this:

(under 2 minutes)
4

I like the delivery styles of Carl Sagan, Richard Feynman and Neil deGrasse Tyson. They've delivered logic, science, and facts in a less sterile way. But when I'm reading research to find specific answers, I prefer a more academic approach.

smile002.gif

1

I have thought I couldnt have both at the same time.

2

Like most of us, I prefer the facts. There IS a time and place for romance, though.
Being a bit poetic while trying to romance someone is fine. Not your dog.
It's not like I'd be in bed with my lover, trying to be romantic and talking about fiery balls.

Of plasma, that is.

MrLizard Level 8 Dec 17, 2017
1

I'm not that extreme, but I do like the more direct approach.

Paul628 Level 8 Dec 17, 2017
2

As Joe Friday used to say, "The facts. ma'am -- just the facts."

wordywalt Level 8 Dec 17, 2017
0

I like to make room for both Science and Art, and don't find them to be in conflict. One deals with the objective and the other the subjective, and we all have both components. I'll take my reality whole, thank you. smile001.gif

skado Level 8 Dec 17, 2017

Good point. But when people are talking to me about reality, I am not thinking about art. Unless we're talking about the art of reality or portraying reality in art.

@MrLizard Yeah, that's sorta my natural tendency too. A mythology-minded friend of mine has helped me learn how to translate between the two languages. I think of it now as a sort of visual/verbal bilingualism.

2

I recall a student once telling me that he felt sorry for me (the judgmental little bastard), because I couldn't appreciate the beauty of a rose. I responded to the little shit by telling him that it was I who should feel sorry for him. "Why?" he asked. "Because I can not only see the beauty at the surface of the rose, but its magnificence all the way through and all the way back," said I.

1

I prefer the scientific method, and find wonder and romance in that.

Stevil Level 8 Dec 17, 2017
1

Snoopy Rocks!

Arasmuson Level 6 Dec 17, 2017
Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text 'q:8922'.
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content read full disclaimer.
  • Agnostic.com is a non-profit community for atheists, agnostics, humanists, freethinkers, skeptics and others!