It's against our Constitution to use the military for civil purposes. We have law enforcement and border patrol to handle border issues. Trump moving the military onto the border is a violation of the Constitution. It constitutes a form of tyranny and or dictatorship.

{In the context of a new,
experimental, and democratic Republic, the Founding
Fathers believed that subordination of the military to the
authority of civil masters was critically important to prevent
the emergence of a new form of tyranny or dictatorship.}

Your, or anyone else's, "zero issues", don't matter. It's the law of the land. On top of that, our interferences in other nations using our military are also against the Constitution. Sanctions included. And right out of the gate, that particular infraction of the Constitution was broken in regards to sending our military into other nations and interfering. Nixon sending the national guard to Kent State was an infraction of the Constitution. It was a local issue that should have been handled by law enforcement. Just the same as it was all around the country in other states and cities. Sending our military abroad for purposes of overthrowing governments that oppose our governments agendas and or structured societies is an infraction of the Constitution. Forced restructuring on multiple layers of another country, almost always resorting in theft of resources, while funding and supporting a purposely built opposition within, is not only an infraction of our Constitution, it's also an international crime.

In which the USAID has been a participant of such crimes in almost every case. Known as a CIA tool front. Probably every case. Which our MSMs are purposely leaving out in their coverage. And I'm not particularly supporting Trump for eradicating this organization. It shouldn't be able to exist period. It's a deceptive evil of the world. That genuine causes within legal means can easily be built and replace it. Russia and China are perfect examples to look at. They do it without any sense of military presence, or threats of, and provide social benefits on multiple levels while doing it. Only if the government in question request military help from them which is basically in regards to Russia. I don't believe China has troops in any arena currently. And probably wish they never got involved in Iraq. As they left as fast as they went in! Probably as they witnessed the crimes being perpetrated around their troops. I'm particularly worried about what Trump will replace it with! The fact of how he eradicated it is criminal. Without having a backup plan in place as he eradicated the criminal aspects of the organization. Few understand this because the media is controlling the issue with false narratives while leaving out the criminal aspects.

@William_Mary It is also against the US Constitution to have a standing army ie the right to bear arms. The Patriot Act replaced the Constitution.
I doubt it is against US law to use the US military for civilian purposes eg disaster relief. US carriers have been brilliant in aid roles after tsunami's etc. I find it hard to believe that the military would be banned to assist with border breeches, only to be used in foreign campaigns.

I remember when sanctions were first really used. They were also all UN approved, until the Patriot Act eg Sth Africa/s apartheid..

Trump is rapidly finding the base from which he negotiates for America from is extremely weak, the weakest in my time. No-one trusts the US anymore and they stand for nothing. So he can continue to bluff and bluster as much as he wants, people like the Houthi will now just ignore and flip them the bird, confident they hold the moral high ground the US once dominated but now undermines.
another crime you may add to his list, he just declared war on Yemen minus Congressional approval. But if you think that's Trump and morally superior other US presidents / politicians would not do that, think again.

There's nothing to be glad about. The American citizenship always loses. Mike Prysner is also a veteran who has been exposing the crimes of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars he was forced to participate in, in regards to Iraq as a specialist. He's speaking from experience here and became an anti-war activist due to what he observed in Iraq. I don't support anyone within the 2 party establishment! It's a crime syndicate bought by the ruling class. As is the MSMs that work for them. Nearly 4900 men and women went into those wars to lose their lives which were built on lies and deceit. Commit crimes. And now were looking at them to be forced into committing more crimes in an arena also built in lies and deceit. Used for the benefit of a few within a delusional ideology based on a genocidal structure as all the rest. Harris has nothing to do with today. To bring up a partisan aspect of a greater problem on a whole indicates your trapped in a rabbit hole of missing the grand scheme being played out on us. Like the vast amount of our citizenship. It speaks loudly towards why they keep getting away with their crimes and unethical practices.