Agnostic.com

7 3

"When disaster strikes, people often turn to religion for comfort and support. A powerful recent example of this comes from a study called “Faith after an Earthquake,” by prominent New Zealand religion and society researchers Chris Sibley and Joseph Bulbulia. They document an uptick in religious service attendance in the city of Christchurch, New Zealand, after a large and deadly earthquake in early 2011 – even as New Zealanders as a whole went to church less. Eventually, though, things reverted to the way they had been, with religion in decline even in Christchurch.

As a scholar of religion, I found this striking because of the particular rigor of their research: The quake happened between installments of surveys in a long-term study about New Zealanders’ attitudes, values and religious beliefs. The results from 2009, before the quake, and in 2011, after it happened, let researchers observe the same individuals before and after the natural disaster. The findings showed that people living near the earthquake, whether religious or not before the event, became more religious in the wake of the tragedy, at least for a while.

I’m hardly alone in wondering what in human nature causes this to happen. One of my research teams uses computers to study how religion interacts with complex human minds, including in processes such as managing reactions to terrifying events. It’s quite common for engineers to use computational models to run virtual experiments – say, to make sure a bridge will stand up to a major hurricane – because it’s a lot cheaper and safer. We’re working to build a computational model whose virtual humans behave the way living humans do when they’re under threat.
[smithsonianmag.com]

sundug 5 June 12
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

I think it's pretty simple: god is dad. Kids run to parents when they are afraid. Fear drives people to seek an authority who has the ability to explain and provide support. It's the "sheep" syndrome humanity is afflicted with. Fear is the driver of all religions and catastrophic events cause people to fear. Where there is no fear, there is no god.

0

And people often don't. I am people and I didn't.

0

Sometimes people try to cover all the bases, including revisiting comforting childhood traditions, in hopes of gaining possible supernatural assistance. Of course it doesn't work, but they soon forget about it anyway.

1

I think it's a mistake to assume that most people's existential beliefs are very considered and thought through. When something happens to make people fearful or insecure, they tend to regress. That's not a major scientific discovery, it's a well known facet of human nature.

It's entirely unsurprising that a percentage of people who are normally non-practicing, who have not worked through their dread of mortality and other issues, might give in to nagging thoughts that they really should be more pious. I'd bet if you looked closely you'd find those people tend to have been raised in the faith they regress to, drifted away out of boredom but always felt slightly guilty about it, and then when god appears to smite them, they reconsider.

It's also entirely unsurprising that this is a temporary effect. Everyone returns to their normal emotional set-points and things return to "normal".

There's another factor at play here, I'll bet. Religion -- apart from its dogma -- does have something of actual value. That's community. When you're part of a community that's threatened, you want to be closer to the rest of the community, and it's not illogical to do that via church, particularly if it's the main mechanism for community and refuge that you are aware of or have access to. And even the more hectoring, authoritarian sorts of religious communities, sensing an opportunity, probably tone it down and soften up in hopes some of them will "stick".

Edit: I also wonder how many people express getting closer to others in the community by means other than church -- by pitching in with recovery efforts, volunteering with NGOs and government agencies and ad hoc neighborhood activities related to that. Not to mention simply making sure there's not a single person you love or care about that you haven't said "I love you" to. There are many ways to huddle around the campfire in a storm; studies examining how people relate to church may be just looking at a narrow aspect of it.

0

A saying often heard is, "There are no atheists in foxholes." That is just not true!

Never trust a study or even a follow up study. This is probably just anecdotal evidence. Religiosity probably has some volatility and varies with time.

Another saying atheists like is, "Correlation does not prove causation." The studies to which you refer show correlation but do not show causation. This leaves us to jump to the conclusion that god made the disaster. Of course thinking that is delusional.

0

A deep and profound awareness of the overwhelming beauty, majesty and mystery of reality lends the keenest of motivation to survive and live well. When life is too easy our minds tend to drift off into mundane things.

0

Just a guess on my part, but I am thinking it might be because such natural events, as predicted in the bible, cause people to think it just might me the end times and they want to get on board before it is too late.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:105551
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.