I think although psychology is seen as more prestigious, sociology is actually more useful in application. Ideally social psuchology whic blends the two sciences would be best.

It is not a science, and (appropriately) suffers from an inferiority complex because of it.

Still in it's "Infancy"

From a Math perspective, it's totally cool, and I enjoyed reading tons of it. Is there some degree of nonsense, idiotically composed studies and unethical behavior? Of course. But otherwise it's pretty empirically kosher, reasonable, etc.

Be more specific. What are your real questions?

Psychology has lost its' way. Fundamentally there are three main reasons for people to be as they are. Physiological (psychiatrists), environmental (psychiatrists, and psychologists) and instinctive (psychiatrists and psychologists). The role of the psychologist is to treat environmentally acquired behavioural patterns. For example, it is common for child victims of dog bites to have a lifetime fear of dogs. The psychologist should be able to identify and treat the phobia using ONLY environmental factors. Slow introduction to small friendly dogs, would be the first step, in that case. In my experience, the psychologist appointment leads to a doctors appointment to get anti anxiety medications to take for the rest of your life. A physiological remedy, to a naturally occurring, appropriate, environmentally conditioned behavioural response.
That's my opinion of psychology.

I think that cognitive dissonance is a brilliant concept. It's too bad discovering it didn't bring Leon Festinger any lasting satisfaction.

I was both a subject and experimenter in a repeat of the Asch conformity experiment during the 1950s. My father and siblings worked as psychologists, but I work in IT.

There's a lot of news about studies with unreplicable results, & all you have to do is read about studies such as the Rat Park experiment (& its predecessor) to see that bias has always been a factor, but... as more studies are done, with larger data sets, stronger methods & better technology, it will improve.

I don't believe in it at all. It doesn't work, yet people continue pretending that it does.

By the way, this website has a bit of a learning curve so here is some information that might be helpful for dating here.

New members are encouraged to earn website points, and help other members get to know them better, by writing an informational profile that includes their hobbies and interests, and answering all the profile questions, since that's the first place many people look when they see a new member.

You've already done some of this.

The website uses profile algorithms to find member matches, so the more details one includes, the better the match.

People make comments and write their own posts to earn more points and privileges; for instance, at level two someone can private email people. There are different perks with each level, and when you reach level eight you get an agnostic T-shirt.

To find members near you, click on the "Meet" button at the top of the page, then on "Members," and enter your preferred search parameters.
Or click on the "About" button at the top of the page to find links to FAQ or the website tutorial.
Click on the 'Meet" button to find member matches

Levels are mostly a way to help identify and reward those who contribute to the growth of the community. The website also gives more access and benefits depending on level.[agnostic.com]

Links to FAQ: [agnostic.com],
and a website tutorial: [agnostic.com]