25 3

What's your lowest compatibility percentage?
100% seems not uncommon, so I looked for my least compatible match and found one at 17% - comfortably below the next lowest of 28%. Any challengers?

By Gareth
Options Favorite Like

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence, and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy

Create your free account

25 comments

6

Yeah, I'm not completely sold on the compatibility percentages. I'd rather look over their bio, and their location. If they're agreeable to meeting I'd go out of my way to meet them. Face to face will tell so much more than the numbers here. I don't want to find my clone, I want someone whose demons will play well with mine, and numbers aren't going to show that.

HippieChick58 Level 9 July 11, 2018
Reply
6

I was curious, so I switched my percentages on. My lowest is 19%. Not surprisingly, though, anything over 30% is high for my matches.

I am a bit difficult.

Donotbelieve Level 8 July 11, 2018
Reply

@Belrieve I believe so.
That's not the problem.
Ha!
I'm incompatible with most of humanity.

Edited

@Belrieve Honestly, I am most compatible with those that I detest, at least according to this site.

My highest matches are people I blocked long ago. I put no stock in this algorithm.

The only person that I'm interested in is barely above 50%.

Edited

@Belrieve bingo

@Belrieve mine reads that you're a 32%.

You are 72% to me. I have no idea how this compatability score is determined, though. ¯\_(ツ)_/ ¯

Edited

@cmadler The percentages are highly suspect.
You're a rarity, according to my average.

@Donotbelieve You're coming in at 53% for me. I don't know if that's bad or good - from what you say, it sounds high for you, but it's low for me! smile009.gif

@Gareth Sounds about right given our levels of "friendliness".

3

The highest compatibility with me has been 59% and that's with someone who self-defines as a gay man... so, no cigar. 100%?! Evidently we're not living on the same planet!

PalacinkyPDX Level 7 July 11, 2018
Reply
3

100%? You must be compatible with everyone. I can't get anyone above 2%. =0}

Countrywoman Level 8 July 11, 2018
Reply
3

13% for me. But the score depends on how narrow the criteria that you set for a potential partner. This person did not have a bio. I'm sure that I can get into the single digits if I specified a supermodel brain surgeon as my match.

minhmeister Level 8 July 11, 2018
Reply

You're winning!

@Gareth This just means I'm the most incompatible. I don't know if this is "winning"

3

33% is lowest. Of course, several have no compatibility percentage, so.... #confused

SheBeSecular Level 6 July 11, 2018
Reply

If there's no percentage at all, it's because the person is not available for dating and such. That's about the only thing I DO know about these percentages.

2

Im going to have ti pay more attention LOL it is interesting responses, views, attitudes regarding sensual revelations that interest me

EvaV Level 7 July 12, 2018
Reply
2

Do you only look at the "matches?" 80 high, 33 low.

kjsgenie Level 6 July 11, 2018
Reply
2

I never really looked at that option lol after checking it, it looks like 34% is my lowest. So, you win. smile001.gif

valerina Level 7 July 11, 2018
Reply
2

I don't recall seeing any above 50. On average, I would say the range is from the upper teens to mid thirties. I've no earthly clue what's behind the algorithm, but maybe it knows that I'm mostly a hermit these days and I don't mess with most people anymore... Who knows?

ghettophilosopher Level 6 July 11, 2018
Reply
2

21 low 53 high but I'm new and still a lvl 2.

FIREmedic Level 7 July 11, 2018
Reply
2

35%

helionoftroy Level 7 July 11, 2018
Reply
2

The lowest one I can find is 20% and below that is 0.

Sheannutt Level 9 July 11, 2018
Reply
2

My lowest is 15% & the highest is 88%. But I have some really enjoyable conversations with guys who are supposedly less that 20% compatible & we find tons of stuff to talk about. The guy I've chosen to date is not among the 80%ers either, so I don't know how much stock to put in those numbers. You really need to talk--just like meeting someone in real life, like we used to do in the old days. & like grandpa said, don't judge a book by its cover.

Carin Level 7 July 11, 2018
Reply
1

I had a 98% once. I didn’t even PM her. I mentioned in a post that she was the highest I ever had. She proceeded to tell me to fuck off. So, I figure the analytics need tweeked.

Ride_Captain Level 7 July 12, 2018
Reply

Similar. I had a really testy exchange with someone who, after I'd made clear in our conversation that I wasn't necessarily seeking a relationship, accused me of leading her on and wasting her time. I pointed out that her profile stated that she was "open to meeting.." and not just dating. She changed her profile settings and our compatibility went up to 100%!

1

I’m thinking all of mine are actually 0%, and they put random numbers up for me to make me feel better.

Ride_Captain Level 7 July 12, 2018
Reply
1

90% to 16% over 32 pages

bingst Level 8 July 12, 2018
Reply
1

Can someone tell me where I find this information....thanks. smile002.gif

patchoullijulie Level 8 July 11, 2018
Reply

It's on the members' thumbnails when you go to the main page (the "A" box top-left of screen). You have to be set to be open to meeting/dating/hooking up or whatever.

@Gareth Thanks for the info. I will check it out.

1

100% is not uncommon?! I think the highest I've seen is 80% (but I still need to write a bio) and the lowest is 23%.

belikewater Level 5 July 11, 2018
Reply
0

Im going to have ti pay more attention LOL it is interesting responses, views, attitudes regarding sensual revelations that interest me

EvaV Level 7 July 12, 2018
Reply
Write Comment
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content read full disclaimer
  • Agnostic.comis the largest non-profit community for atheists, agnostics, humanists, freethinkers, skeptics and others happy without religion!