How many times have you felt this way in life?
6 Certain Signs of Being in Love
Science-based ways to know if you're in love.
Posted Jun 23, 2017
Is this love or is it something else?
People talk about being "in" or "out" of love, but this clear, categorical distinction isn't always reflective of reality. The puzzle of whether you're actually in love is further complicated, because different people define love differently. Some think of it as peaceful, quiet companionship; others view it as an intense physiological experience marked by longing and passion. Still others (e.g., Sternberg, 1986) recognize that some love — consummate love — has intimacy and passion, as well as commitment.
Relationships characterized by consummate love, the kind of mutual love that will last, often share certain features. Turning to the research, here are six central signs of being in love:
You're authentic with this person. Showing the real you is part of the experience of finding the kind of love that can last. Couples that prioritize honest conversation and true self-disclosure, rather than habits of deception, tend to be more satisfied (Lopez & Rice, 2006) and to have the kind of open exchanges that allow for deeper connection.
Your eyes really are only for each other. People in love tend to focus in on each other. Indeed, one strong predictor of relationships ending is how attentive people are to other potential dating partners. Research shows that looking at and paying attention to desirable alternative partners predicts less commitment, investment, and satisfaction (Miller, 1997), all factors that tend to be found in loving, lasting relationships (Rusbult, 1980).
Your physical relationship leaves you with an afterglow. Often, for people in love, sex is more than just sex. New research suggests that it's the positive affect and affection that many couples experience through sexual activity — not sex itself — that drive positive outcomes for individuals and their relationships (Debrot et al., 2017).
You're motivated to make your partner's life easier. Passion is important, but so too is concern for your partner, and his or her concern for you. People's relationships benefit when each partner gives and receives the kind of generous caring designed to promote each other's well-being, termed compassionate love (Fehr, Harasymchuk, & Sprecher, 2014). While this alone won't define being "in love," it is a structural component that distinguishes short-term lust from the kind of long-term love you might be looking for.
You take risks with your partner. Sometimes it's easier to gloss over your past or tell a difficult story without the real emotion, but intimate risk taking appears to be a positive factor in satisfying relationships (Lopez & Rice, 2006). Love provides the safety and trust that enables people to engage in uninhibited self-disclosure.
You intrinsically enjoy your partner's company. You're attracted to your partner, but how much do you like him or her? Liking is distinct from passion, but a component of the kind of "in love" that tends to translate into long-term relationship happiness (Ault & Lee, 2016). Liking your partner signals a high degree of reward in a relationship, and the kind of interpersonal pleasure helpful in sustaining a relationship.
While research psychologists search for more elements of the ever-elusive equation that defines love and being in love, findings to date suggest that both emotional and cognitive factors play a part. In other words, affective reactions matter, but so too do decisions, such as commitment decisions, in determining if you've found lasting love.
References
Ault, L. K., & Lee, A. (2016). Affective and interpersonal correlates of relationship satisfaction. Philosophy, 6, 115-130.
Debrot, A., Meuwly, N., Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Schoebi, D. (2017). More than just sex: Affection mediates the association between sexual activity and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Advanced online publication.
Fehr, B., Harasymchuk, C., & Sprecher, S. (2014). Compassionate love in romantic relationships: A review and some new findings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 575-600.
(cross posted in Love)
Makes sense but it's bad at separating toxic relationships from good ones
Yes, there are other articles on that. Spotting red flags are important. I think when we are in this type of love we do not notice red flags as much.
Predictors only but excellent predictors, and it is novel to see an article about "love" with scholarly references. While I can't address for how many it is or isn't true, my unconventional disagreement would be with #2. My best relationship/s was when I had two committed partners, one open-/poly- and the other monogamous with me.
#2 should flow back into #1 for me. The importance was- we were open with each other about attractions, willing to work with each other's needs in the committed relationship/s first (which means some exclusions of strong attractions), and had eyes for the other when we were together.
"How many times have you felt this way in life?"
Three times / four people.
(@coralisthree)
Can't remember her reciprocating...sad, huh? I'm guessing 1988. That's the last time I saw her.
Never in any relationship. But I’m hopeful for the future. Thanks for sharing this!
@Buckknows I think we actually might have a chance based on this!
This is an excellent article. Good definition of "healthy love".
This is an excellent list. A little clickbaity/cosmo but the points are well described and insightful.
I wish I had this list 20 years ago. It should probably be required consideration for anyone thinking about getting married--and should be answered by each partner individually.
Yes, I wish there was some type of empirically validated questionnaire to give someone before becoming their partner.
I could post a Journal article, but everyone's eyes seem to glaze over. Psychology Today is a popular magazine. It is better than Cosmo, which just tells women how to get a man and how to drive him wild with hardly any basis in fact. Some of the opinion articles from the magazine leave a lot to be desired, but I would say that it is more fact-based than Cosmo.
Was reading not long ago,how a Womans Vagina will absorb certain chemicals in her male partners ejaculation after sex,affecting her moods,improving their bond together,with multiple chemical symbols,and types.
I read in a scholarly article that while a heterosexual couple are in love the male makes less testosterone and the female makes more. One can only ponder why.
@Wangobango3 That happens when they already share most genetic characteristics. People often pick partners that look like their opposite sex parent. So the closer to inbred you are, the more that's true.
My parents were married for 66 years before my dad died and no one would mistake them for siblings. One was stereotypically Jewish and the other stereotypically Scandinavian.
They also say that people start looking like their dogs. I wish! That's only true when you pick a dog that already looks like you. My dogs have always be far more attractive than me.