Agnostic.com

5 2

I had stated before that the cops don't have to protect you, the cops on here said I had misinterpreted the precedent.
Here is another example.
[upi.com]

MacTavish 7 Dec 29
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Since the cops don't have to protect ordinary citizens do they then have the legal ability to pick and choose which calls they will answer?
Can this be applied to which citizens they will/won't protect?

0

Interesting.. that's actually kinda surprising.. but I guess they can't have any precedents that show the public can sue the cops for not showing up on time. ?

1

As a former law enforcement officer I can tell you that they’re not legally obligated to sacrifice their lives for anyone but are expected to isolate the perpetrator/s if possible and to guide victims to safety if possible and to observe and report until backup arrives or the threat has been neutralized.

I mean don’t get me wrong he should’ve made his way towards the gunman but to believe that a school officer is going to have swat like training and intuition is actually pretty ignorant.
Most of them are placed there because they have the right demeanor and/or they’re not as street worthy as they or their department might want them to be.

I agree that the officer should’ve been replaced from his post and maybe placed in a no conflict position but politics is pretty powerful in events like this.

And unless it could be proven that the officer had been directly involved with this event then the lawsuit was useless and to maybe force policy changes. But unless they take on the U S Department of Justice they’re not going to change the expectations of police in these instances.

1

funny. "to serve and protect" comes from somewhere... can't think where....

g

It's a cookbook!

@jerry99 lots of people don't want a second serving 🙂)

g

0

That's true, police have no legal obligation to protect or serve as a bodyguard, they only enforce the laws and apprehend those who break them. Private security forces exist for a specific reason...

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:254928
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.