Agnostic.com

4 0

Who’s seen The Phantom of the Opera (2004)? IMO it’s a dreadful film.

Gerard Butler was miscast.
The Phantom is supposed to have a voice like an angel, whereas Butler is passable but not that great.
He’s incredibly handsome. Which is WRONG!!! The Phantom is supposed to be hideous, that’s why he’s hiding in a dungeon and trying to bewitch Christine instead of going up to her and asking her for a date. (Or whatever men did in those days.)
When you do see his face, after that sliver of a mask gets pulled off, it looks like he has a bad sunburn or something. It makes you wonder why Christine is so perturbed earlier, when she sees him.

His backstory - the reason he’s pointlessly evil (was there really any reason to kill Joseph Buquet? Because he peeps into the girls’ dressing room??) is because as a child he’s implausibly kept in a cage and exhibited in a freakshow, which scars him for life. That seems unnecessarily dramatic. There was no poignant backstory in the book (I don’t know about the original Broadway production). We didn’t need one. The original book had a Persian talking about how he built trapdoors in the Shah’s palace, and that was enough for me. Of course, getting beaten in a traveling circus because of a sunburn could turn anyone into the psycho spoiled brat he was portrayed as in this movie.

The other thing that really, really, really pissed me off is how they made the Phantom such a joke. He appears at a masquerade, decending the stairs like a toddler stamping his feet, and instead of being menacing and eerie he just looks so ridiculous and insignificant. Why would anybody take him seriously? And that swordfight with Raoul - mercy me! The Phantom SHOULD NOT LOSE A SWORDFIGHT, especially with a wimp like Raoul. In real life any red-blooded woman would take the Phantom, sunburn and all, over this guy.

I think this movie is popular among young women because the Phantom is all tortured and solitary and still looks hot. It’s a hot mess!

altschmerz 9 Feb 9
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

This sounds like movie I should avoid and it also sounds like Butler needed the money.

0

My daughter watched it quite a lot about 5 years ago. I found it too full of singing. Don't operas have any speaking parts in them?

Anyone who wants to really know my feelings about the world of opera should read Terry Pratchett's Maskerade. It pokes holes relentlessly in all the cliches of opera. For instance, that big chandelier is just too dramatic for its own good....

Not to nitpick, but Phantom of the Opera is not an opera. It's a musical. They aren't the same, and in my opinion, when the musical was written by Andrew Lloyd Weber, it's a far inferior artistic product.

@pasha-one-nine Either one has too much singing in it.
I was once dragged to Evita. Three lines that were spoken, everything else was singing. For three hours as I recall. And I'm not sure whether the word "No" counted as a spoken line, or if she just sang it on a sad descending note.

0

I can tell you exactly what's wrong with the movie; Joel Schumacher.

0

It was an ok movie. I enjoy the live musical more. The original novel by Gaston Leroux is one of my favourite books.

@Closeted I went to a screening of the 1925 movie with the accompaniment of a symphony orchestra and pipe organ. That was amazing. And yes I hated the ending.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:285591
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.