I was listening to an interview today that Terry Gross conducted on NPR with a lady theologian -- a very bright and sincere lady. What I heard in that interview, merged with past experiences like my admiration for the Lutheran theologian, Reinhold Niebuhr It made me realize that what is at the core of most religions is not belief in a god -- or any , but the concept of living a "good" life. The good life in that sense is treating other humans creatures and environments with full dignity, respect, love, and actual caring actions. That is what makes life worh living and which also sustains life.
That aha moment enabled me to realize that, in that sense, I am, and have always been religious. But I do not need a god, a "holy book" or a demagogic and authoritarian religious figure telling me what his dogmatic "truth" is the only way and must be followed. I realize that have always been seeking a meaningful interpretation of the good life (not always successfully) and striving to live that good life. And, I am comfortable with my attempts and with the overall consequences of my actions.
I simply cannot conceive of a deity which creates creatures, professes love for them, them condemns them to hell for not worshiping him. And, I will always act against any religious sect or denomination which actively seeks to impose its false dogma on me and others, which is harshly judgmental of others from other religions, ethnicities, sexual persuasions or political stripes -- or which seeks to deny people of their right and obligation to define and pursue a truly good life.
The system of thought is called Humanism, that is putting the human beings first, ( plus feeling animals to my mind ). As soon as you start to set up other things, like gods, immortal ancestors or spiritual nature, which are seen as having their own motives and intentions, then you are no longer putting human wellbeing first.
And since those things do not communicate, because they are not real, their supposed intentions can be manipulated by those of bad intent to serve any evil they wish.
I don’t understand how needing the threat of hell in order live a good life is something be proud of. I think if that were the case for me, I would want keep it a secret.
Actually, I don’t believe most religious people actually do require this threat. I think many of them have just convinced themselves that they do.
Religions convince them that they cannot be good without the threat punishment.
It's ironic that so many are convinced that they cannot exist without religion when the converse is the reality.
At this time religion is starting to show it's true colors. Basically, control and a way to allocate limited resources to a select few. Everyone else be damned.
Good stuff. Makes sense ... and I was thinking the very same thing today. About not needing a God supervisor making sure you "act good" in order to "be" good
That is why I like the American Humanist Association stance of being good without god. I don't know when I developed the mindset that I have, but I strive to be better and to do good. I try to do good for the planet, for my family, and for my fellow man. I have a "mama bear" streak, I look out for my cubs and my broad definition of "my cubs" is anyone who is weak and in need of help. When I looked at scriptures with an eye open for fair treatment of the weaker, I was dismayed. I think that is when my fall from xianity was accelerated.
If religious people all felt that way, it would be a much better world.
If everybody felt that way, it would be a much better world.