Agnostic.com

5 2

Republicans remained intransigent this week after dragging their feet to even negotiate for 10 weeks on the second unemployment package. Their primary concern was that people on unemployment will receive more on unemployment than at their regular job.

In a sense, there is a modicum of truth to this. But they failed to ask the essential question why? The answer is multi-fold.

  1. The average worker targeted works on or near the minimum wage level. If minimum wage were raised to a living wage, I contend that this would not be a decider as whether a perdo chose to return to work or collect unemployment (I'll talk more about this below);

  2. Many of the presently unemployeed work in non-essential dervice industries (food, alcohol, entertainment, travel, etc.). Either these jobs disappeared with the advent of the COVID pandemic or they came back, only to re-disappear as COVID re-spiked in key areas;

  3. Many are still afraid of contracting the virus and bringing ot home yo their spouse, children, or older parents and grandparents. A reasonable fear given the lack of adequate testing and continued spiking;

  4. Many are single parents and no longer have access to child care, which disappeared under COVID. Or with schools going virtual, they need to remain home with thier children because their children are stll home;

  5. In an interview last night with Erin Bunett, Kudlow insisted that most people primarily worked for the paycheck. I contend that this is short sighted and myopic thinking. Of coarse a paycheck is both desirous and necessary to survive in this society(excluding the homeless, which are an exception by their numbers as opposed to the rule). I contend that there is a second stimulus for people wanting to work that is just as important.

I contend ( and studies exist to support) that most humans need to feel that they are being productive and providing something positive. Their self-esteem and self-worth is tied to this feeling of being productive. Even if they do not like their job there is a part of their well-being tied to this concept. In the past the cocept of a work ethic was a critical part of society and culture. It isnt always idrntified the same way between cultural grouos, but it still existed. I also contend that if the minimum wage were a living wage, many would eagerly and enthusiastically return to work, even if unemployment brought them a bit more than their normal wage.

So the question is this? Who are the Republicans kidding. No one desires this pandemic to continue and remain unemployed. Once it is under control, people will flock back to work, eagerly. The fiscal conservatives are standing on selfish ideology (afterall, all them are have a regular psycheck, health care, and regular testing) and depriving the most vulnerable a opportunity for having at the very least the basics for survival.

One final point. The question arises as to whether the work ethic has changed over thevlast four generations. Below is the abstract and URL for a resesrch study that looked at that very question. Enjoy.

[scholar.google.com]

t1nick 8 Aug 8
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

More fundamentally, it's a lie. There is no such choice. As far as I know and understand it, once the job is offered back to an employee, the unemployment benefit ends.

Exactly, no argument there. The problem there are no jobs to offer back. The point was that if a choice were offered, and it entailed living wage, the majority would return to work even if we're a choice. The idea that work is more than just a paycheck. Wirh the struggles involvex in bring out of work, many would return regardless. Its mostly Republicans that think money first above all else. Humanity second, if at all.

2

They " found BILLIONS " for cruise ships & airlines- we just have no lobbyists 😏

0

Republicans weren't even in the negotiations. It was between the Democrats and the White House. Mitch signed off on whatever the White House agreed to.

The Democrats in the House passed their bill 10 weeks ago. It provided help and support for the states and municipal.

The Republican version (drafted a week ago) offered no help for cities or the city. The Freedon Caucus was involved in holding it up behind the scenes. Regardless whether Miscow Mitch was actively involved or not, the Republicans deserved to be damned.

No argument from me. Let's hope that translates to defeat in the election. The revelation that Moscow has been feeding anti-Biden propaganda to Senators demonstrates that a goodly part of the GOP has been compromised. Where is McCarthy when we really do need him? Joking there, but really, we need to actively root out Russian interference.

1

The Senate Republicans just followed orders, Mitch being "The Grim Reaper" just said F the poor they can live on 200 a week, because Trump told him to, so Trump can offer 400 and look like a hero while still F ing the American public in the process.
The income tax halt is to weaken and destroy Social Security, it's pretty clear.
If they offered an income tax halt but still take the withholdings for your SS contribution that "might" be an idea, but not this.

3

what is this thing with those on the right? to be so concerned there's someone who is gonna make more money from unemployment than working for the rich, that they're prepared to let people who really need the help not get anything. completely irresponsible behavior for a representative of the people.

its part of the new Republican ideology. If you are white and rich, you do not deserve anything.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:522855
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.