I watched some of the testimony by former Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund. His testimony was contradicted by that of the Sargent at Arms. They still could give no CREDIBLE excuse for not having the National Guard in position beforehand. What does that say?
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
It was an inside job. The rioters had help from some officers at the line level and, more importantly, help at the command level. Glad that the head of the Capital Police was canned and also the Sergant At Arms from both branches of congress also had to go.
TomMcGiverin
Level 8
Feb 24, 2021
2
These people's JOB was to defend the Capitol and they left it open for a massacre. That is as treasonous as it gets. These (Russian) spies should be in Guantanamo getting the same treatment as Al Qaeda or worse.
@racocn8 They aren't Russian spies, just allies of Trump that wanted to see the riot and insurrection happen. Same as 9-11. The intelligence was there to stop it, but they let it happen because it served the agenda of the Bush admin. to get a war with Iraq, get their oil, and be able to pass a domestic survelliance act like The Patriot Act.
@TomMcGiverin You are correct that they are not Russian spies per se. However, Trump IS beholden to Putin and acts at his behest, thus, Trump IS a Russian spy. The Capitol supervision that only obtained National Guard protection after the attempted coup failed were merely acting under the direction of the traitor Trump. Had the coup succeeded, with Congress mostly murdered and martial law imposed, Dictator Trump would now have free reign to control the country according to Putin's wishes.
The Capitol Police supervision acted on behalf of a hostile foreign adversary, violating their oaths, acting against their mandates, and while wearing uniforms not reflecting their loyalties. Maybe they didn't take instructions from Putin, but saying they are foreign spies, or more accurately, saboteurs, still seems vastly closer to the mark than their testified denials.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.