Another deeply insightful and thought provoking comment from an esteemed member of the dog shit squad, better known as the agnostic.com troll police .Oh goody!

@Emanuele iF we had an actual Troll Police I would enjoy being a member. Until then, I guess I will just have to comment as I see fit, leaving myself open to troglydites such as you.

You obviously didn't read it... And seriously,, you don't see anything wrong with a list?? It's like telling a cat burglar 'Please don't rob THESE houses of mine, because I keep my GOOD stuff in them.."

@Captain_Feelgood I don't agree with you so I didn't read it? That's some self serving bullshit if I've ever read any. Why don't you actually address what I said and why it's wrong.

The list I've already explained. This might shock you, but diplomacy is not the same thing as planning home robberies.

@redbai Ahh.... didn't read it because you don't agree with me? Wow, so ignorance IS bliss.. I did address what you said and why it's wrong. Self serving bullshit?? Like the shit Dems quote about Trump wasn't? Yeah, okay. This might shock you, but the comparison of the cat burglar with Putin is EXACTLY the same.. The fact you can't see it speaks volumes about your mindset. I can see you're not capable of admitting when you're wrong because you hate it when a right winger points it out to you. I put folks like you on my ignore list for intellectual dishonesty, and willful ignorance like this. Man... this list is getting long.. Welcome to it. Don't waste your time responding, I won't read it.

@Captain_Feelgood You apparently aren't aware of what question marks are for in other people's comments because I was questioning your claim that I didn't read it, not asserting that I didn't read it.

You didn't address what I said, you claimed that I "obviously didn't read it", a self serving claim that allowed you to rant on about cat burglars instead of address that geopolitics is not the same as planning a home burglary. The idea that you think they are "EXACTLY the same" simply demonstrates that you have no idea how geopolitics work. You claiming two things are the same is not demonstrating that they are the same, but I get the feeling that you never bothered differentiating the two concepts.

No one is forcing you to partake in a conversation with me and you not doing so will be no more relevant than a fly after I kill it at a BBQ. You believing you've put forth an "intellectual" argument is kinda funny, but I get the idea your ego lets you believe just about anything that comes out of your mouth.

Try it now... is working for me..

Clearly the poster isn't a Biden fan, but oddly enough, I heard that story about a list, and I did think it was poor PR. I mean, shouldn't the list have had only thing on it: "Don't attack anything, MFer, or we'll kick your cyber-ass into the ground!" The list thing didn't sound good. What is the logic - you can attack everything else but not these things on the list?

@David1955 People who have nuclear weapons don’t talk to each as you suggest.

@yvilletom since the humour was obviously lost on you, the point was, a clear message conveying that no further attacks on any systems will be tolerated should have been conveyed, and people with nuclear weapons certainly talk to each other like that, and not with lists of things they'd prefer were not attacked.
I'll make a note that you don't do irony or sarcasm.

@David1955 Hm-mm, I will make a note of your lack of experience with political power.

In short, don’t draw “red lines” until you have the power to suitably punish people who cross the lines you draw.