Agnostic.com

24 0

What does everyone think about that new study that make pose the question of whether or not there was civilization tens of millions of years before us?

DanDanDanDan 3 Apr 18
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

24 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

I have proof....

?? not da mama

3

I dismiss it as just speculative nonsense. It is easy and doesn't take any intelligence to make a claim for anything you can possibly imagine in a human brain and people do it all the time. That is how religion started.

No, it's science. This is how it works.

@Druvius but there’s that new theory that science is just a dream and that the universe is just a drop of water on the spoon of some other being stiring their coffee! Seriously; I read it somewhere and it was research and science and stuff (they even had white lab coats on!) 😉

@Druvius No, it's not science and it's not even close to how science works. Science follows the scientific method, it doesn't present an answer and then cherry pick "evidence" to fit it.

@Druvius No, it's not science and it's not even close to how science works. Science follows the scientific method, it doesn't present an answer and then cherry pick "evidence" to fit it.

@JimG So you didn't read the study, got it.

2

Amazing to me how many people leaped to the conclusion that this study was saying there is evidence for pre human civilizations. No, that's not even remotely what it was about. It was about, what sort of geological evidence would a pre human civilization leave? No different than "If the Big Bang happened, what sort of evidence would we see?" There's no evidence for a pre human civilization, but it's not impossible, and this study just clarifies what any scientist seeking evidence for same should look for.

Well put. That was the point of the study, what would be there if there had been one, not the assumption that one was there.

1

There being no evidence to suggest such a civilization existed on Earth, it's become more a study to determine what kind of evidence OUR civilization might leave behind which could be discoverable millions of years from now.
I have one word for you: plastics.

[motherboard.vice.com]

1

So they doubt that there has been, 'civilisation' but are putting forwards a hypothesis of things that may prove it if it had happened? Well clearly if it did they were more sucessful at being sustainable than us if they have gone undetected all this time 😉

1

Science at its best. If there was a pre human industrial civilization, what traces would it leave? The preservation of ruins or fossils are extremely unlikely after tens of millions of years, but there are things in the geologic record to look for. None have been found yet, but but this study may encourage scientists to look further. Seems unlikely, but certainly can't be ruled out.

That's what I took from the 'article'. Traces, if they exist, may be present so it pays to keep an eye out, however long the odds.

1

Has it been peer reviewed?

1

It's more of a mental exercise not a study. There's no evidence to suggest there were civilizations on earth before humans.

JimG Level 8 Apr 18, 2018
1

It's all conjecture. There is no evidence for it. It's a nice little thing to ponder on a rainy Sunday afternoon, but that's it.

1

Whilst tens of millions of years ago, isn’t very long ago, it’s still a magnitude of time greater than the 120,000 years odd that Homisapiens have been around. It’s an even smaller amount of time before Homosapiens had anything that could be called a civilisation.

Any “evidence” in this un-cited “study”?

1

Highly Skeptical since there is No Fossile Evidence of the sort you would need.

1

I'm going to need more proof than a "study".

0

On Earth? If such a civilization had existed, we would have found evidence.

0

They are studying the question whether or not.

Rosh Level 7 Apr 19, 2018
0

Bound to create conflict.

0

There have been hominins for a few million years, but none that could create a civilisation. I can readily accept some civilisations in the 10s of thousands of years range. Maybe a rudimentary hunter gatherer civinisation of primates about 2 million years back, I seriously doubt it though.
10s of millions of years, no way.

0

The Flintstones of course.

0

What study? Conducted by whom or what group? What did id say?

0

[arxiv.org]
Here is the source

0

It's nothing new. Theosophists have believed in such things for a long time.

0

How is going to change rest of my life?

@Sealybobo My life already been in jeopardy more than once and now I am happy to say I don't watch tv.

0

What jlynn37 wrote - better than anything I could have - he's spot on.

0

That seems highly improbable. Evidence would great.

0

@DanDanDanDan -- What new study is that? Where can I find it?

[arxiv.org] Here ya go

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:60984
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.